Suzanne Bonamici headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Oregon District 1
Born
October 14, 1954
Age 71
Phone
(202) 225-0855
Office
2231 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Oregon District 1

Suzanne Bonamici

Suzanne Marie Bonamici is an American lawyer and politician serving as the U.S. representative for Oregon's 1st congressional district, a seat she was first elected to in a 2012 special election. The district includes most of Portland west of the Willamette River, along with most of Portland's western suburbs such as Beaverton, Hillsboro, Tigard, and Lake Oswego.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 553
Yes39%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Suzanne Bonamici headshot
Suzanne Bonamici
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOregon District 1
SoupScore
Suzanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 56 sponsored · 268 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

This bill requires the name on your current ID to match the name on your birth certificate—which is not the case for close to 70 million women. And it adds unnecessary and expensive but unfunded mandates on local election offices.
Voter fraud is extremely rare and we already have laws in place to prevent it and hold violators accountable. Despite that, the House passed the SAVE Act, a voter suppression bill that will needlessly disenfranchise citizens in Oregon and across the country.
As we’ve seen in other cases, this administration is treating political speech as a crime in their effort to stifle dissent & create fear. My office is in contact with affected Oregon universities and will continue to demand answers.
A teacher in Florida was just fired for using a student’s preferred pronouns. GOP politicians are trying to put this kind of hateful policy into federal law, and I spoke out against their efforts in a recent Education Committee meeting.
In the Biden-Harris administration we passed legislation to bolster the semiconductor and clean energy industries, creating thousands of good paying jobs and catalyzing billions in private investments to build new factories and facilities.
If Trump and GOP leadership really want to revitalize American manufacturing, they wouldn’t be gutting investments that have created thousands of green manufacturing jobs—including in red districts.
I led 8 of my colleagues from the Pacific Northwest in a demand for answers from the Trump administration, but we got no response. We will keep fighting these proposed closures and we won't stop fighting for more affordable housing.
We have an affordable housing crisis in Oregon and across the country, and HUD should play a role in addressing it. But we recently heard that HUD plans to shut down several offices, including the office in Portland, even though the law requires that they have an office in every state.
The House GOP just passed a budget framework that will cut Medicaid and other health care, veterans’ benefits, food assistance, and other vital programs—all to give billionaires like Elon Musk tax cuts that they don’t need or deserve.
The Education Secretary wasn’t sure what IDEA is, and now she’s confusing A.I. with a brand of steak sauce. This is another example of what happens when people are appointed because of their loyalty to Donald Trump rather than merit.
Congressional Republicans are trying to cut Medicaid, but we’re fighting them every step of the way. Medicaid provides health care to millions of people, including people with disabilities, so they can stay healthy, learn, work, and live with dignity.
My GOP colleagues are putting their political careers over the well-being of their constituents and the country. The economic chaos Donald Trump created—not even 100 days in office— shows why Congress, not Trump, should craft tariff policy.
This is big: House Republicans tucked language into the budget res “rule” that bans the House from voting to terminate Trump’s emergency declaration used to impose tariffs. TL;DR lawmakers who vote for this are officially giving up their power to revoke his tariffs until October.
Businesses need certainty, but Donald Trump is causing economic chaos and instability by threatening and then revoking tariffs. It’s clear that this administration is not focused on what is best for the American people.
Thank you to the local advocates who visited my office to emphasize the need to support Ukrainians. Putin’s illegal invasion threatens global peace and stability, and the U.S. must continue to stand with our allies against this attempted authoritarian takeover.
Congresswoman Bonamici stands with Oregon advocates for Ukraine while holding the Ukrainian flag.
The Trump administration purged all the workers who oversaw this vital program, needlessly putting lives at risk. This isn’t about efficiency or eliminating waste; it’s an attempt to end public programs and services.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
553 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-11-20H.R. 3109 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H. Res. 893 (119th)Motion to ReferNOYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 6019 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 4058 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5107 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5214 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H. Res. 888 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 80 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 130 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 888 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESFailed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-11-18H.R. 4405 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESFailed
2025-11-18H.R. 2659 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-17H.R. 1608 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-13H.R. 5371 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-11-12H. Res. 873 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-12H. Res. 873 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-19H. Res. 719 (119th)Approve resolutionPRESENTYESPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-18H.R. 1047 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3015 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3062 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 713 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5143 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5125 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 5140 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 4922 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 2721 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-15H.R. 3400 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-15H.J. Res. 117 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3486 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3944 (119th)Instruct negotiatorsYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 12Next →