Mark Harris headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 8
Born
April 24, 1966
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-1976
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Mark Everette Harris is an American Baptist pastor and politician from North Carolina. A member of the Republican Party, he is the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th congressional district since 2025.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 551
Yes76%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Harris headshot
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 70 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I am optimistic (or naive) enough to believe that there's a chance Netflix would commit to running WB as a separate theatrical business while taking an exclusive first streaming window for its movies and exploiting its huge library. I would expect them to show their hand about that fairly soon.
That's bad enough, but there is also no evidence that Ellison knows how to run one studio (he's owned Paramount for about five minutes), let alone two. He's part of a generation/mindset that is all about mining existing IP and has zero knowledge/interest in how good movies are developed and made.
especially if the rumor that Netflix would get Warner Bros. (the studio) and Comcast would get HBO Max is true. All consolidation is bad, but a right-wing Trump-loving techbro dynasty owning and destroying two of the five remaining major studios is beyond bad.
It's hard to overstate what a catastrophe it would be for moviemaking and moviegoers if the Ellisons are allowed to acquire Warner Brothers and merge it with Paramount. I know that rooting for Comcast and/or Netflix sticks in a lot of throats here but those would be far better alternatives... >
You always hear the rationale that if a reporter stood up to Trump, they'd be kicked off the plane/out of the briefing, etc. Which means what? That they'd no longer be present for something that's already widely disseminated without their help? They trade dignity and integrity for access to nothing.
This is not a job any news organization gives to its best or bravest or strongest reporters.
There are certain things you have to ignore, including logic and the fact that this version of Chicago could not look (and sometimes sound) more like Australia if a kangaroo with a koala on its back hopped across the screen. Just go with it. You deserve this.
I tore through Peacock's All Her Fault and I feel quite dirty, but it's wildly entertaining and unlike most "8 hours/coulda been 3" series, this one packs in at least 3 seasons of utterly bananas plotting. Sarah Snook does 50 shades of incredulous horror; Jake Lacy remains TV's greatest bad husband.
I really wanted to be above all this, but I can't stop laughing and gasping, so you can call me part of the problem and give me a stern talking-to but OH MY GOD.
sir this is a McDonald's
Trump: "They don't laugh at us anymore. They respect us now, again. And that's what we want. We want to be liked. We want to be respected much more so than being liked. And you know in a certain way they like us better now too. Because the world was ripping off our country. Not sustainable."
I read the Nuzzi excerpt in Vanity Fair, and there is something maddening about her choice to refer to RFK Jr. not by name but with mock coyness as "the Politician." It suggests that the chance to actualize some Carrie Bradshaw-meets-Big fantasy fueled all of this. Anyway, I don't need to know more.
lol this actor on Bridgerton thinks that not eating between breakfast and lunch is "intermittent fasting." I've tried that diet too! So far no results but it's only been a few years.
When asked about a typical day of eating on set, Newton told us he would start off the morning with a banana protein shake, then he would intermittently fast until lunch, when he would have his meal kit and sometimes indulge in a sweet treat like a “crumble or cinnamon social,”
I know a lot of people who aren't writers use it for writing. I think those are people for whom needing something to be written is a means to an end, and I understand that. But for me, it's the means and the end. It's my one skill. I try to improve at it every day. I cannot imagine surrendering it.
When I started work on my latest book, I joked that in the afterword I would write, "This book was written without the use of AI." Now I'm thinking I really should do it. Not that people will necessarily believe writers when we authenticate work as our own, but it's at least worth a try.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
551 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-26H.R. 695 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 788 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H.R. 818 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-02-25H.R. 832 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-24H.R. 825 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-13H.R. 35 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-12H.R. 77 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-12H.R. 77 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-02-11H. Res. 122 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-02-11H. Res. 122 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-02-10H.R. 736 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-10H.R. 692 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-02-05H.R. 776 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-02-04H.R. 43 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-01-23H.R. 471 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 375 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-01-22S. 5 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 165 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-21H.R. 186 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsNONOFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 12Next →