Mark Harris headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 8
Born
April 24, 1966
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-1976
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Mark Everette Harris is an American Baptist pastor and politician from North Carolina. A member of the Republican Party, he is the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th congressional district since 2025.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 551
Yes76%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Harris headshot
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 70 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

We're getting down to "Well, he doesn't wear the uniform or have a weird little mustache" as one of the last remaining explanations of how JD Vance is not an actual Nazi.
JD Vance: "A lot of young people are saying housing is way too expensive. Why is that? Because we flooded the country with 30 million illegal immigrants who were taking houses that ought by right go to American citizens."
I love the way each of the six baby crocodiles in this photo seems to have a completely distinct personality. Top (l.-r.): Introvert, idealist, jerk Bottom (l.-r.): Class clown, stoner, pessimist
By the mid-1970s, only 200 American crocodiles remained, their habitat largely gobbled up by sunseekers. But hope lurked in the shadows of a nuclear power plant—the same facility built to air-condition the homes that had led to the reptiles’ demise. Read more about this unlikely partnership:
Jay Kelly opens in theaters tomorrow. I may be in the minority on this one, but I think it's great--a dark, sad, tough take on fatherhood and celebrity disguised as a warmhearted, glowy one. Did you think Noah Baumbach was going to spare anyone, even George Clooney? Have no fear. He does not.
I honestly don't think it's different from "The protesters are paid by Soros" or "Schumer has been working for the Republicans all along." People want to believe that they're up against a giant, hidden, well-orchestrated conspiracy even in the face of evidence that most people can't keep secrets.
This is wild, and as a lifelong proud-ish Upper WEST Sider, I offer it as humble proof that although God knows we have our faults, the Upper East Side is...hooboy. Not the same AT ALL. This really captures how the UES can sometimes feel like the largest gated community in NYC.
"The more-than-300 comments responding to that anonymous post are full of mothers looking for property in New Jersey or Florida, predicting that Mamdani’s promise to make buses free will lead criminals to rape and kill innocent passengers." LMAO @ UES mommies crashing out
This is actually good spin, or would have been. But the fact that the Democratic cave happened without even a coordinated, agreed-upon message like this indicates the depth of the leadership void.
From a Bluesky post on which the author chose to disable quote-tweets (fair enough, and I wouldn't quote it if I weren't complimenting it: "Instead of saying this was good strategy, maybe senate dems should say: "the republicans were going to kill people by starving them to death, and because we aren't monsters, we decided to let this fight go. We'll keep fighting. Stop electing monsters.""
I miss my dog. I miss looking down. I miss checking to see if she's asleep. I miss her breathing. I miss her indifference to whether I'm busy. I miss the sound of her drinking from her water bowl. I miss her delight in having a completely predictable day. Death sucks.
This isn't "internal recriminations." It's voters expressing overwhelming opposition to what the people they elected to represent them are doing, and anyone--either in journalism or politics--who characterizes it as infighting is either not seeing and hearing what's right in front of them or lying.
The sooner we get past internal recriminations and back to fighting united, the better off we all are — the likelier our victory next November.
I don't think I've actually said it, but as a gay man, I certainly understood it when it was used by gay and trans people. When I say "I'd hesitate to use it again," I mean that I think there are better rhetorical strategies available to LGBTQ+ people that are less likely to be coopted by bigots.
Sometimes I see a post that I am at least four different words away from remotely comprehending and it feels oddly soothing, like listening to grownups chatting in the next room must have felt when I was in my crib. Just a nice hum. (I know. Something sports something. Please do not explain.)
The only surprise about atalanta firing juric is that Fiorentina sacked pioli first
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
551 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-03-17H. Res. 1115 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-03-17H. Res. 1115 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-03-17S. 3971 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2026-03-17H.R. 4294 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-03-05H. Con. Res. 38 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-03-05H. Res. 1099 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1100 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H.R. 6472 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04S. 723 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-24S. 2503 (119th)Fast-track passageYESNOFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 6329 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-12H.R. 2189 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Motion to CommitNONOFailed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-11H.J. Res. 72 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-10H.R. 1531 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-09H.R. 6644 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-04H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-03H.R. 7148 (119th)Accept Senate changesYESYESPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-03H.R. 3123 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-02H.R. 980 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H. Con. Res. 68 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Final passageNOYESPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7147 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 3 / 12Next →