Mark Harris headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 8
Born
April 24, 1966
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-1976
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Mark Everette Harris is an American Baptist pastor and politician from North Carolina. A member of the Republican Party, he is the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th congressional district since 2025.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 551
Yes76%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Harris headshot
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 70 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

What makes you think this poll is unreliable? It was created and conducted with input from CNN, AP, the three major networks, and Fox, and sampled almost 5000 voters.
No, I live on the UWS--which went for Mamdani overall--but in a neighborhood within it that went hard for Cuomo; it has been painful to see misinformation and suspicion spread like a virus here over the last few months.
For non-Jews/non-NYers: It's crucial to understand that Jews in NYC have always been treated as a uniform political bloc, and Jews who oppose Israel's policy toward Palestinians have always been treated as marginal/dismissable. A public breaking-off of 1/3 of NY Jews from that history is monumental.
This is a stunning political realignment--Mamdani lost Jews, Catholics, and Protestants but won by sweeping "Other" and "None." As a Jewish voter in the 33% I hope my neighbors (literally) in the 63%, who were flooded with dishonest mailers, social media, and texts, will now keep an open mind.
A CNN demographic analysis:
Protestant (21%): Cuomo 49, Mamdani 42
Jewish (15%): Cuomo 63, Mamdani 33
Catholic (27%): Cuomo 53, Mamdani 33, Sliwa 10
Other (14%): Mamdani 70, Cuomo 25
None (24%): Mamdani 75, Cuomo 21
Reposted byMark Harris
The survey question should be "What do you do when the Lubavitchers come up to you on Sukkot and ask 'Are you Jewish?'" - say no - say no and later feel guilty - say yes and shake the lulav - say yes and keep walking briskly
I'm getting a lot of pushback along the lines of "How dare they not break down 'Other' by religion!" but none whatsoever complaining that LGBTQ+ is an umbrella category. (Both represented 14% of the electorate.)
This is a stunning political realignment--Mamdani lost Jews, Catholics, and Protestants but won by sweeping "Other" and "None." As a Jewish voter in the 33% I hope my neighbors (literally) in the 63%, who were flooded with dishonest mailers, social media, and texts, will now keep an open mind.
A CNN demographic analysis:
Protestant (21%): Cuomo 49, Mamdani 42
Jewish (15%): Cuomo 63, Mamdani 33
Catholic (27%): Cuomo 53, Mamdani 33, Sliwa 10
Other (14%): Mamdani 70, Cuomo 25
None (24%): Mamdani 75, Cuomo 21
I guess you'd be wherever you decided to put yourself! (I am a secular cultural Jew whose mother was Catholic, and my heart goes out to the pollsters who probably got an exhausting earful of our life stories when they asked this question.)
This is a CNN exit poll of 4700 voters. Also notable: No gender gap whatsoever; a huge education gap; and a robust LGBTQ+ turnout--we were 14% of the electorate and broke for Mamdani 82-15, which was, obviously, enough to break the 46-46 tie among straight voters. www.cnn.com/election/202...
This is a stunning political realignment--Mamdani lost Jews, Catholics, and Protestants but won by sweeping "Other" and "None." As a Jewish voter in the 33% I hope my neighbors (literally) in the 63%, who were flooded with dishonest mailers, social media, and texts, will now keep an open mind.
A CNN demographic analysis:
Protestant (21%): Cuomo 49, Mamdani 42
Jewish (15%): Cuomo 63, Mamdani 33
Catholic (27%): Cuomo 53, Mamdani 33, Sliwa 10
Other (14%): Mamdani 70, Cuomo 25
None (24%): Mamdani 75, Cuomo 21
If any of you doubted that Mamdani would, if he won, become an instantly national figure, I urge you to seek out and watch his speech in full. It is a barn-burner, with a big piece of it aimed right at Trump and another big piece pretty clearly aimed at the Democratic Party establishment.
Mamdani reiterates his support for trans folks, his determination to fight "the scourge of antisemitism," and his pledge to fight Islamophobia--and throws a punch at the billionaire-funded campaign of lies against him. "In a time of political darkness, New York will be the light." This is a SPEECH.
This account will be equal parts hopeful and gloating for the rest of the evening. To that end: Pour one out for the pile of NYC billionaire money that was utterly incinerated tonight!
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
551 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3425 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3424 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNOYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 539 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 747 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 4216 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 4275 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 3357 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 1917 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 3937 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3351 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3095 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 7 / 12Next →