By cutting billions of dollars in food assistance that children and families rely on to survive, Trump has shown that he has no regard for our lives, our liberties, or our happiness.
Trump’s actions today are unpatriotic and inherently un-American. 3/3
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Jersey
Andy Kim
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 789
Yes30%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Andy Kim
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Jersey
SoupScore
Andy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 33 sponsored · 237 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
By slashing funding for Medicaid that will strip millions of their health care, close hospitals and nursing homes, and make it harder for seniors and people with disabilities to get the lifesaving care they need, Trump has betrayed the American people. 2/3
On a day when families around the country are celebrating the rights and freedoms that our nation was founded on, Trump and Republicans in Congress have betrayed the American people and our founding principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. 1/3
…We owe the American people more than fireworks and political theatre on the anniversary of this country’s liberation from the same. We owe them all a government worthy of their pride.” 2/2
Every word of this. Thank you, @repbonnie.bsky.social.
“I am appalled at the cruelty on display during what should be a week of reflection, celebration, and recommitment of our nation’s pursuit of a more perfect union.” 1/2 www.nj.com/opinion/2025...
As we celebrate the 4th of July, I reflect on the reasons why I do this job – to create a better world for my kids.
Here's one of my favorite photos from the Jersey Shore. If you're headed to the beach this weekend, have fun and stay safe!
The passage of Trump’s Big Disastrous Bill is a disappointing display of cowardice and a betrayal of the American people. Let it sink in: they chose tax cuts for billionaires at the expense of the health, safety, and prosperity of the people who they represent. 4/4
Chris Smith represents a large senior population in our state that I represented in the House for four years and that I know can't afford these painful cuts to Medicaid and SNAP. 3/4
Jeff Van Drew said he wouldn’t support cuts for Americans eligible for Medicaid but then just voted to gut care for hundreds of thousands of New Jerseyans. 2/4
I strongly condemn the votes of Reps. Tom Kean Jr, Jeff Van Drew, and Chris Smith that will hurt countless New Jersey families.
Tom Kean broke his promise and voted to continue the SALT tax cap for another decade instead of just letting the cap expire this year. 1/4
...and possibly losing our lives to preventable overdose without continued substance use treatment."
This is what's at stake with the Republicans' Big Disastrous Bill. Thank you, Elissa, for telling your story. 2/2
"Myself and a group of directly impacted New Jerseyans from Congressman Van Drew’s district met with his staff... and we laid out what was at stake for us: losing treatment, losing healthcare, losing access to food and housing... 1/2
We must tell Republicans in the House that we are NOT okay with New Jerseyans footing the bill and going hungry all so that they can give tax cuts to billionaires. 2/2
I'm hearing from folks all across New Jersey about how Republicans' dangerous cuts will take food away from seniors, children, and other vulnerable communities. 1/2
Any vote other than a full repeal of the SALT cap is a vote to raise taxes on New Jerseyans.
I wrote a letter to Rep. Tom Kean, Jr. to remind him of his promise and the constituents he has to answer to.
Yesterday, Senate Republicans betrayed the American people.
Will House Republicans follow in their footsteps or have the courage to put their constituents before billionaire interests?
Reposted bySenator Andy Kim
LIVE ON AIR | Join a bonus episode of The Impossible State with @kim.senate.gov & @victordcha.bsky.social on the key challenges and opportunities of U.S.-Japan-Korea trilateral ties.
Recorded live at our June 18 trilateral forum.
WATCH: www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPT0...
Rabiyatu's and Roseanny's stories are unfortunately not unique. I think we can all agree that college costs too damn much right now.
Taking away opportunities for students is no way to lead. House Republicans must show courage and reject their Big Disastrous Bill once and for all.
My joint statement with @booker.senate.gov on the nomination of Alina Habba for U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey.
Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t need more money.
House Republicans have a choice: tax cuts for billionaires or health care for 16 million Americans.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History789 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
789 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (5-94) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 26 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26 | YES | NO | ✕ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-83) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 33 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33 | YES | NO | ✕ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-82) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-42) |
| 2025-04-02 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-02 | S.J. Res. 37 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-48) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-03-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-03-27 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-48) |
| 2025-03-26 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.