Jason Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Missouri District 8
Born
June 16, 1980
Age 45
Phone
(202) 225-4404
Office
1011 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Missouri District 8

Jason Smith

Jason Thomas Smith is an American businessman and politician who has been the U.S. representative for Missouri's 8th congressional district since 2013. The district comprises 30 counties, covering just under 20,000 square miles of southeastern and southern Missouri.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 566
Yes78%
No21%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jason Smith headshot
Jason Smith
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanMissouri District 8
SoupScore
Jason's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 7 sponsored · 8 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Grocery prices are still too high, and Minnesota farmers are struggling as the bird flu devastates their flocks.   The Trump administration’s response has left too many questions unanswered. Farmers need help now and working families need to see prices come down.
Senator Smith putting on protecting plastic to cover her boots.
Senator Smith standing talking to a man.
Senator Smith and Senator Klobuchar participating in a round table.
Trump, Musk and Republicans are gutting the VA — firing thousands, many of them veterans — to pay for tax cuts for billionaires. Fewer doctors, longer wait times, and worse care. This is reckless and a betrayal of the veterans who served our country. They deserve better.
Trump lets Musk run completely unchecked through our government, firing workers managing things like housing support and veterans care just so they can give themselves and their billionaire friends big tax breaks.
U.S. Senator Tina Smith smiling while giving a high five to someone in the crowd at the St. Patrick’s Day parade in downtown St. Paul.
U.S. Senator Tina Smith talking to AFGE members who are wearing green shirts that say “Not Billionaires. Not Union Busters. Not Musk.”
An AFGE worker holding a sign that says “Cutting Government Funding = Cutting Human Services.
U.S. Senator Tina Smith talking to a AFGE worker wearing an Irish kilt and patting them on the back.
Tribal sovereignty is inherent—it predates the United States and is enshrined in treaties, federal law, and the U.S. Constitution. We won't stop reminding the Trump administration of these facts.   Thank you to the Minnesota Indian Affairs Council for having me today.
U.S. Senator Tina Smith sitting with Tribal leaders and MIAC board members at their Sovereignty Day event at the Minnesota State Capitol.
Reposted byTina Smith
Trump and Republicans set this up as an unprecedented power grab so they can slash and burn government services on their terms. I’m a firm NO — on cloture and final passage — on this ‘CR’
Reposted byTina Smith
Millions of Americans need help finding shelter and keeping it. The Trump administration is withholding $3.5 billion in approved funding from folks who need it most. @smith.senate.gov and I are urging HUD to distribute those funds now.
Not to ruin everyone’s day, but don’t forget in the midst of this ‘CR’ chaos that they’re also trying to install a snake oil salesman (Dr. Oz) as head of Medicare and Medicaid. Finance Committee questions him today.
Trump and Republicans set this up as an unprecedented power grab so they can slash and burn government services on their terms. I’m a firm NO — on cloture and final passage — on this ‘CR’
Project 2025 says fire federal workers, so they are. Project 2025 says abolish the Department of Education, so they are. Project 2025 says kick moms and babies off Medicaid, so they are.   Project 2025 calls for a national abortion ban using the Comstock Act… see where I’m going with this?
Doesn’t take a detective to uncover that Republicans are enacting Project 2025 – just last night they began dismantling the Dept. of Education. Everything points to them misusing the Comstock Act to ban abortion even in states where it’s legal. Today, I’m re-introducing a bill to stop them.
Text: This is what Heritage thinks a GOP president should do, as aid out in Project 2025: reviving the nineteenth-century Comstock Act as a federal (abortion) ban.
Reposted byTina Smith
Don’t tell me that Trump/Musk are not trying to destroy Social Security. 30,000 people died last year while waiting to get their benefits. Under this new policy, those numbers will skyrocket. We can’t kill seniors so that billionaires get their tax breaks.
Nothing to see here this is totally normal and happens all the time and isn’t weird at all and doesn’t signal any sort of corruption
Headline: Musk Seeks to Out $100 Million Directly Into Trump Political Operation
Headline: Trump selects a new Tesla on White House Driveway to show support for Elon Musk
Taking health care from moms and babies just doesn’t produce quite enough money to shell out to corporations and billionaires, so he simply MUST dip his paws into grandma and grandpa’s Social Security too.   The rich can never be too rich right?
Elon Musk reiterated his intention to destroy programs like Social Security, which he has called a Ponzi scheme: "Most of the federal spending is entitlements... that’s the big one to eliminate."
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
566 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-05-05H.R. 36 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 530 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 78 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.J. Res. 60 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 859 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 1442 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 1402 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-04-28S. 146 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-28H.R. 973 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 22 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 22 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-04-10H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Accept Senate changesYESYESPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 1228 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 1526 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-09H.R. 1526 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-04-09S.J. Res. 18 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-09S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-09H. Res. 313 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-04-09H. Res. 313 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-04-08H. Res. 294 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-04-08H. Res. 294 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-04-07H.R. 1039 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-07H.R. 586 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-01H.R. 1491 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-01H. Res. 282 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-04-01H. Res. 282 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-03-31H.R. 997 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-31H.R. 517 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.J. Res. 75 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-27H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-25H. Res. 242 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-03-25H. Res. 242 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-03-25H.R. 1534 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-24H.R. 1326 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-24H.R. 359 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-11H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-11H.R. 1968 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-11H.R. 1968 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-03-11H.R. 1156 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 10 / 12Next →