The Fourth of July marks the day America declared itself an independent country that is ruled by no king.
Today, we celebrate our freedom and liberty.
I hope everyone has a fun and safe Independence Day! 🇺🇲
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Wisconsin
Tammy Baldwin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes30%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Tammy Baldwin
U.S. SenatorDemocratWisconsin
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 43 sponsored · 265 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Today, Republicans chose to put their super-rich friends over working families. They chose to terminate health care for 17 million Americans. They chose to decimate our rural hospitals. They chose to take food from hungry children and families. www.rollingstone.com/politics/pol...
No matter how my Republican colleagues try to spin it, their budget bill will devastate families.
This fight isn’t over. Keep calling. Keep writing. Keep telling your story, we can beat this thing.
www.weau.com/2025/07/01/s...
Keep calling. Keep emailing. Keep speaking out.
We can beat this terrible bill that is going to rip health care from millions and rig our tax code for the rich – but it will have to be a people-powered effort. Let’s do this.
Reposted bySenator Tammy Baldwin
@baldwin.senate.gov on the Capitol steps with people who will be hurt by this bill. She is right: the Big Beautiful Betrayal would be devastating for the health of children.
1 in 3 kids count on Medicaid for their care.
Donald Trump claims to support closing this tax loophole that lets Wall Street get off the hook from paying their fair share.
Well, now is the time for him to finally put some pressure on Senate Republicans to support my amendment to do just that. www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/senate/...
I'm on the Capitol steps with Senator Klobuchar and families who are speaking out against the bill that Republicans are trying to jam through that would take away health care from 17 million Americans.
We are not giving up in this fight.
Wisconsinites have said loud and clear that they don’t want their health care and food assistance taken away. And the majority of Americans agree. Instead, Republicans have chosen the interests of big corporations above the well-being of American families.
apnews.com/article/poll...
❌Kicking 16 million off health care
❌Taking away food from seniors and kids
❌Putting rural hospitals at risk
The Republicans' budget bill is nothing but bad news for American families.
That’s why I am voting NO.
56 years ago, brave Americans stood up to hate and violence at the Stonewall Inn, sparking the LGBTQ+ movement for equal rights. Today, as we continue to see attacks on the LGBTQ+ community, we are reminded of what’s possible when we stand together in the fight for equality.
Today, as Senate Republicans try to figure out how they are going to jam through Donald Trump’s terrible budget bill, my stance remains unchanged.
I have never voted for a bill that takes health care away from millions of Americans.
And I’m not going to start now.
Under the Republicans' budget bill, kids and seniors will have food taken away from them, and millions of Americans will be kicked off their health care.
To put it simply, Wisconsin families will lose.
These are the consequences when you put a vaccine conspiracist in charge of making sure Americans can get safe and effective vaccines. This is a disgrace.
abcnews.go.com/Health/exper...
3 years ago, with our Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, we took historic steps in our fight against gun violence by expanding background checks and boosting mental health resources.
This was the first step, not the last, to end this epidemic and stop the heartbreak.
This fight won’t be over until we get our reproductive rights back. ny1.com/nyc/all-boro...
ICYMI: Republicans are gearing up to make the LARGEST cut to food stamps in history. We cannot allow them to take away food from our seniors and children who rely on this critical program.
www.cnbc.com/2025/05/21/s...
When we say the Republicans’ bill will terminate hundreds of thousands of Americans’ health care, we’re also talking about basic reproductive care like birth control, cancer screenings, and wellness exams.
www.leadertelegram.com/news/daily-u...
It is downright cruel that the Trump Administration is taking away this lifeline for our children and telling LGBTQ+ kids that they don’t deserve help when they are facing their darkest moments.
www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-...
From the moment he was nominated, RFK, Jr. has made it clear that he would put his conspiracy theories over the health and well-being of American families. And he is making good on that promise. thehill.com/homenews/edu...
Families need some relief, but Republicans’ budget bill does just the opposite — taking food assistance away from millions of Americans and jacking up the cost at the grocery store for millions more.
www.npr.org/sections/sho...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Motion (Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Motion (Schumer Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Decision of the Chair H.R. 1 | NO | NO | ✓ | Decision of Chair Sustained (53-47) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Decision of the Chair S.Amdt. 2360 to H.R. 1 (No short title on file) | NO | NO | ✓ | Decision of Chair Sustained (53-47) |
| 2025-06-28 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-06-27 | S.J. Res. 59 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 59 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-06-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-06-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-40) |
| 2025-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (61-35) |
| 2025-06-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (58-33) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-46) |
| 2025-06-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (68-30) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-40) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-39) |
| 2025-06-16 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-33) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-27, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (67-30) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Amdt. No. 2307) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Agreed to (64-33, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (45-52) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 54 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 54 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 53 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 53 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (68-30, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-41) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (51-41) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-38) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (72-26) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-36) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-37) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.