Michael F. Bennet headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Colorado
Born
November 28, 1964
Age 61
Phone
(202) 224-5852
Office
261 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Colorado

Michael F. Bennet

Voting Record — 915
Yes28%
No63%
Present0%
Not Voting9%
Party align96%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Michael F. Bennet headshot
Michael F. Bennet
U.S. SenatorDemocratColorado
SoupScore
Michael F.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 84 sponsored · 280 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

President Trump has weaponized the federal government against Colorado. No American should have to fear political retaliation from their own President.
From working families struggling to put food on the table to farmers and ranchers facing historic diesel and fertilizer costs, Coloradans are paying the price for President Trump’s Iran war and reckless global tariffs.
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law provided historic investments in Colorado roads, bridges, transit, and airports. With billions in funding set to expire today, Congress must pass a bipartisan surface transportation reauthorization that protects these investments and keeps critical projects moving.
As alarms sound about the risks of AI, we need an independent federal agency that can put safeguards on Big Tech while ensuring America remains competitive in AI.
We need a cop on the beat to protect the safety of the American people from the risks of AI. That’s why I’m introducing an independent agency to oversee AI innovation and ensure Big Tech companies play by the rules.
I'm proposing an independent federal agency to regulate AI and big tech. We need to act before serious harm occurs and hold these companies accountable when they break the rules.
We eliminated measles in this country more than 30 years ago. We shouldn’t be fighting it again because this administration refuses to take science seriously. Colorado’s kids and families deserve better.
AI companies need to face real consequences, including the power to pause unsafe technology and impose serious penalties of up to 15% of global revenue. It’s time for an independent agency with the authority to regulate Big Tech and AI, protect the American people, and keep pace with innovation.
Thank you to CiviCO for a great conversation about strengthening civic engagement and trust in our democracy. We're counting on Colorado's future leaders to join us in building an economy that works for everyone.
Devastating to see firsthand the impact of this year’s historic drought and record-low snowpack on Blue Mesa Reservoir’s water levels. I was glad to hear from Western Slope water leaders about how they are working together to respond and how I can support them moving forward.
CMU is proof that education built for today’s economy opens pathways to good-paying jobs across Colorado. Great to learn more about the CMU Tech apprenticeship program and how it’s preparing students with the skills they need to build careers and earn a living wage.
Tonight begins Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar. To Coloradans observing tonight and tomorrow, I wish you a meaningful fast and a peaceful time of prayer and reflection.
Tonight begins Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar. To Coloradans observing tonight and tomorrow, I wish you a meaningful fast and a peaceful time of prayer and reflection
Lake San Cristobal is the namesake and crown jewel of Lake City, a community that has shown great resiliency in the face of the devastating Elk Fire.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
915 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-07-22—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-07-22—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-44)
2026-07-22—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (62-36)
2026-07-22—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-35)
2026-07-22—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (49-46)
2026-07-21—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-48)
2026-07-20—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (43-40)
2026-07-16S.J. Res. 198 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-50)
2026-07-16—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48)
2026-07-15—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2026-07-15—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-07-14S. 4784 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-07-14—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-45)
2026-07-13—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (46-44)
2026-06-24S.J. Res. 185 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGYES—Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50)
2026-06-24—End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-24S.J. Res. 196 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGYES—Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-52)
2026-06-24—End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-06-24—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNO—Nomination Confirmed (50-44)
2026-06-24—End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-24—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNO—Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2026-06-24—End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-23H. Con. Res. 86 (119th)Accept House changesYESYES✓Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48)
2026-06-23—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (67-30)
2026-06-22H.R. 6644 (119th)Accept House changesNOT_VOTINGYES—Motion Agreed to (85-5)
2026-06-18—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNO—Nomination Confirmed (48-39)
2026-06-18H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGYES—Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-8, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-17S. Res. 616 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 616NOT_VOTINGYES—Motion to Discharge Rejected (44-50)
2026-06-17—End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41)
2026-06-17—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNO—Nomination Confirmed (55-39)
2026-06-17—End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41)
2026-06-16H.R. 6644 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGYES—Motion to Proceed Agreed to (87-8)
2026-06-16S.J. Res. 172 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 172NOT_VOTINGYES—Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-48)
2026-06-16S.J. Res. 190 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGYES—Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-48)
2026-06-15—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNO—Nomination Confirmed (48-43)
2026-06-11—End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-43)
2026-06-11—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNO—Nomination Confirmed (49-44)
2026-06-10—End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44)
2026-06-10—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNO—Nomination Confirmed (50-44)
2026-06-10—End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2026-06-09—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNO—Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2026-06-08—End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Budgetary Discipline Re: Lee Amdt. No. 5804)NOT_VOTINGNO—Motion Rejected (50-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Motion (Wyden Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions)NOT_VOTINGYES—Motion Rejected (48-51)
2026-06-05S. 1318 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNO—Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNO—Bill Passed (52-47)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schiff Amdt. No. 5740)NOT_VOTINGYES—Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 5632)NOT_VOTINGYES—Motion Rejected (53-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYES—Amendment Rejected (45-53)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Cassidy Amdt. No. 5812)NOT_VOTINGYES—Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 19Next →