For Landry, his family, and millions of families like his. We must continue pressuring Republicans to vote NO on this budget bill. We must save Medicaid.
op: Senator Chris Murphy
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Jersey
Cory A. Booker
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 840
Yes28%
No67%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align95%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cory A. Booker
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Jersey
SoupScore
Cory A.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 102 sponsored · 507 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
But we celebrate this anniversary with the recognition that LGTBQ Americans’ rights are under attack and the fight continues. I will continue to stand up for equality for the LGBTQ community.
In the decade since the Obergefell decision affirmed the right to marriage equality nationwide, it has been awe-inspiring to see celebrations of love flourish across our country.
Mr. Bove has a complete disregard for the rule of law.
To prove his loyalty to Trump he’s fired FBI leaders, targeted and threatened agents, and removed agents from domestic security and child abuse investigations.
Congress should be investigating Bove’s actions at DOJ, not considering him for a judicial nomination.
Trump is rewarding another one of his personal lawyers with a lifetime appointment to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
Emil Bove has been the architect behind the execution of Trump’s orders at DOJ.
This SCOTUS decision allows politicians to prevent you from choosing your doctor and care. This will have disastrous consequences for millions of Americans across the country who rely on Planned Parenthoods services for basic health care.
Planned Parenthood provides vital care for millions of Americans every single year, including cancer screenings, screenings for diabetes and hypertension, vaccinations, and testing for sexually transmitted infections.
The Trump administration should be doing everything possible to keep Americans at home and abroad safe, not crippling our diplomatic corps. Firing thousands of highly specialized State Department employees is shortsighted, dangerous, and should not move forward.
Someone who is advising Trump to violate court orders should not be sitting as a judge on the court.
This bill is not something Americans will just “get over.” But a message to anyone who votes for this — there’s a good chance people WILL get over YOU.
Emil Bove is not capable of being an impartial judge on the Court of Appeals.
Republicans think they can screw with our lives, and we’ll just “get over it.”
But they need to know..if they vote for this bill, we WILL remember each and every one of them.
@senateinsession.bsky.social @warren.senate.gov
I oppose Emil Bove’s nomination to a lifetime position on the Court of Appeals.
The Dobbs decision rolled back the rights for women across the country, I will continue to work everyday to ensure every American has bodily autonomy and access to reproductive care including an abortion.
This bill is a disaster for the country, and a threat to our democracy.
op: @katiecouric.bsky.social
America should lead the world in AI and other emerging technologies—and in setting clear rules of the road to ensure they align with the public interest.
These goals aren’t in conflict. They reinforce one another. This provision undermines both.
I oppose it.
This would undermine states’ ability to address real and pressing harms, like AI systems that enable discrimination in hiring, housing, and healthcare.
In addition to throwing 16 million people off their healthcare, cutting food assistance for 2 million hungry kids, and slashing taxes for billionaires, the Republican budget bill would punish states that adopt AI regulations at any point over the next decade.
Emil Bove has no respect for the rule of law and court orders. He does not belong on the federal bench.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History840 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
840 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17