Cory A. Booker headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Jersey
Born
April 27, 1969
Age 57
Phone
(202) 224-3224
Office
306 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Jersey

Cory A. Booker

Cory Anthony Booker is an American politician and lawyer serving as the senior United States senator from New Jersey, a seat he has held since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, Booker is the first African-American U.S. senator from New Jersey. He was the 38th mayor of Newark from 2006 to 2013, and served on the Municipal Council of Newark for the Central Ward from 1998 to 2002.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 840
Yes28%
No67%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align95%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cory A. Booker headshot
Cory A. Booker
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Jersey
SoupScore
Cory A.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 102 sponsored · 507 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Trump’s corrupt dismantling of the FTC will result in less accountability for corporations, jeopardizing Americans’ livelihoods and fundamental market stability. Trump’s friends, like the world’s greediest man Elon Musk, might benefit, but American families will suffer.
The FTC is independent and supposed to be free from political interference. Congress put it into law specifically to prevent a corrupt President, like Trump, from using it for his political and personal ends, doing whatever it takes to enrich his friends and donors at the expense of working people.
there is no accountability at the FTC if Trump orders its Republican Chair, Andrew Ferguson, to give powerful corporations preferential treatment, even at great expense to American taxpayers.
Trump’s attempts at illegally firing Bedoya and Slaughter will slow down that work if not bring it to a screeching halt. Without the minority party commissioners...
The FTC commissioners Trump tried to illegally fire are currently suing Amazon, enforcing a twenty year consent decree against X, trying to strengthen privacy protections for users of Meta, and working on numerous investigations or lawsuits against companies that donated millions to Trump.
Just recently the FTC has saved working Americans money by: – Eliminating junk fees to stop deceptive pricing – Combatting monopolization in our food system, preventing even more price-gouging – Fighting for the “right to repair” products you own from tractors to iPhones
Congress created the independent, nonpartisan FTC in 1914 to protect Americans by fighting monopolization and business tactics that rip off consumers, suppress workers, and stifle competition. For over a hundred years, it carried out its mission under Republican and Democratic presidents alike.
This week Trump tried to illegally fire two Commissioners from the independent Federal Trade Commission. This politically driven overreach will ultimately harm working American families and consumers. 🧵
At a time when Americans are struggling with rising food, housing and medical costs, Trump is once again taking the hatchet to the watchdogs that are in place to stop Americans from being ripped off.
Trump just illegally fired the two Democratic members of the Federal Trade Commission – an independent agency that Congress created to protect your rights as consumers.
Medicaid is not an abstract program. Nearly 1 in 5 New Jerseyans–children to seniors–rely on it for health care coverage. The GOP is hoping we won’t notice they are planning to rip away these life-saving programs from millions of Americans–to pay for a tax cut for billionaires.
The cuts to the Department of Education are cruel and illegal. This department provides vital services and funding to schools of all levels in all 50 states that are now in jeopardy.
Social Security is funded by the hard-earned savings of working Americans. We owe it to seniors and working people, who’ve paid into Social Security their whole lives, to make good on our promise of a secure retirement. The attacks on the program by Donald Trump and Elon Musk are unacceptable.
They want you to believe they are the party of law and order while they’re actively pushing for cuts that will jeopardize the city’s public safety and critical services like firefighters and schools.
Congressional Republicans’ have proposed cutting $1 billion from D.C.’s local budget that would force the city to lay off thousands of first responders, police, and teachers.
My heart breaks for the family and loved ones of Detective Joseph Azcona of the Newark PD who was killed in the line of duty Friday night. Wishing the other officer involved a full recovery. Please keep our community in your hearts as we work to heal from this terrible loss.
An honor to stand with activists and advocates this morning to make clear to Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and Congressional Republicans: Medicaid cuts will have devastating effects on New Jerseyans and raise costs for all Americans.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
840 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationNOYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNOYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 17 / 17