I wrote legislation to divert Trump’s “Board of Peace” slush fund and assist working American families pay their power bills. The President doesn’t need another billion dollars to do who knows what with – it’s time to put Americans first.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Nevada
Catherine Cortez Masto
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 779
Yes34%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align91%
Cross-party9%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Catherine Cortez Masto
U.S. SenatorDemocratNevada
SoupScore
Catherine's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 101 sponsored · 240 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Think about this: every single Senator agreed to pass TSA funding last Friday. That’s Democrats and Republicans. But Speaker Johnson chose to block that funding and put up his own bill which he knew would not pass the Senate.
The ball is in the Speaker’s court.
The Fourteenth Amendment is clear: if you’re born in the United States, you’re an American citizen.
The Court must swiftly rule against this Administration's shameless effort to subvert the Constitution and advance Stephen Miller's racist agenda.
www.cnn.com/2026/03/31/p...
President Trump's executive order is blatantly illegal. He knows he doesn't have the authority to stop Nevadans from voting by mail.
Nevada will continue to run Nevada’s elections – not a President who votes by mail only to turn around and say others can't.
abcnews.com/Politics/tru...
Dreamers deserve better than the carelessness and cruelty coming from Donald Trump and his cronies, and I will not stop lifting up their stories and fighting for them.
DACA has helped these Nevadans and thousands more become pillars in our community. They’re contributing, they’re paying taxes, and they’re building a future for their families in the country they call home.
They’re Dreamers, and they’re facing severe challenges because of the Trump Admin.’s processing delays that are putting their DACA status at risk – and with it, their jobs and their livelihoods.
Yesterday, I heard from a teacher, a health care worker, a law enforcement support worker, and a coordinator with our carpenters’ union. Do you know what they had in common?
Thank you to Steve Flores and the Hope Christian Health Center team for the work you’re doing in our community to keep our families healthy. Federally Qualified Health Centers like HCHC are essential for so many of our neighbors to get affordable care, and I’m proud to support them in the Senate.
Don’t miss my conversation with Ben Meiselas on TSA funding, Iran, the SAVE America Act, and the latest in my fight to hold Donald Trump accountable.
Thanks for having me, Ben!
@meidastouch.com
youtu.be/mciLQlr71Ak?...
The President shouldn’t have a billion-dollar blank check at all, but certainly not while Nevadans struggle to pay their bills because of his recklessness abroad.
My legislation would rescind his slush fund and use it to bring down costs for working families.
Speaker Johnson has a bill at his desk to fund TSA right now. Every single Senator, Republican and Democrat, agreed to pass it.
But he's holding it up to play political games with a resolution he knows is dead on arrival in the Senate. It's just ridiculous, and Americans deserve better.
This is just common sense and it’s outrageous that Mike Johnson won’t pass this into law.
Every Senator agreed this morning to the straightforward proposal I have been calling for since February: pay TSA, fund FEMA, fund the Coast Guard - but no funding for Trump's immigration operations without reforms to stop the abuses he's enabled.
Senate Republicans had the opportunity yesterday to undo some of the damage they have done to working families by repealing a Trump job-killing IRS regulation.
They voted to keep energy costs higher.
The Trump Admin. has driven costs through the roof, and instead of doing anything about it, they're creating slush funds for themselves.
I introduced a bill to redirect Trump's "Board of Peace" slush fund toward cutting power bills for working Americans.
Our power grids are facing more demand than ever before, and that strain is creating a risk to our national security from bad actors who could take advantage of weak points to cause havoc.
That's why I'm working on a bipartisan bill to protect our electrical grids nationwide.
Donald Trump doesn't even believe his own lies about mail-in voting.
But that isn't stopping him from pushing legislation like the "SAVE America Act" to make it harder for you to vote and hold him accountable.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History779 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
779 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-41) |
| 2025-12-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-40) |
| 2025-12-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-39) |
| 2025-12-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-36) |
| 2025-12-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-12-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-41) |
| 2025-11-20 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-43) |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 76 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-11-19 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-32) |
| 2025-11-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (65-32) |
| 2025-11-10 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Bill Passed (60-40) |
| 2025-11-10 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-40, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-11-10 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (60-40) |
| 2025-11-10 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-40, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-11-10 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (76-24) |
| 2025-11-10 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (47-53) |
| 2025-11-10 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (47-53) |
| 2025-11-10 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (60-40) |
| 2025-11-09 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (60-40, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-11-07 | S. 3012 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-43, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-11-06 | S.J. Res. 90 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 90 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-11-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-43) |
| 2025-11-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-11-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-11-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-11-04 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-44, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-11-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-10-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-10-30 | S.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-47) |
| 2025-10-30 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-45) |
| 2025-10-29 | S.J. Res. 77 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-46) |
| 2025-10-29 | S.J. Res. 69 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (25-72) |
| 2025-10-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-10-29 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-10-28 | S.J. Res. 81 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-48) |
| 2025-10-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-10-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-47) |
| 2025-10-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-10-28 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-10-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (58-40) |
| 2025-10-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-10-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-10-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-45) |
| 2025-10-23 | S. 3012 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-10-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-10-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-10-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-39) |
| 2025-10-22 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-10-21 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.