Tammy Duckworth headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Illinois
Born
March 12, 1968
Age 58
Phone
(202) 224-2854
Office
524 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Illinois

Tammy Duckworth

Ladda Tammy Duckworth is an American politician and Army National Guard veteran serving as the junior United States senator from Illinois, a seat she has held since 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, she represented Illinois's 8th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives from 2013 to 2017.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 840
Yes29%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Tammy Duckworth headshot
Tammy Duckworth
U.S. SenatorDemocratIllinois
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 52 sponsored · 381 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Our troops deserve a Commander in Chief who does right by them. Not one that throws them into an unjustified war with no plan and no end state—and works to hollow out the VA.
Reposted byTammy Duckworth
Join us live at 11:30 AM from Capitol Hill as U.S. Senators Tammy Duckworth, Ruben Gallego, Andy Kim, and Tim Kaine, alongside VoteVets Sr. Advisor Max Rose and veterans from across the country, hold a press conference calling on Congress to stop the ongoing Iran War. www.youtube.com/@votevets
BREAKING: After 80 long days, four Republicans voted with Democrats and helped advance our War Powers Resolution that would rein in Trump's illegal war. Our troops and the American people have paid enough.
Taxpayer dollars should be spent on helping you. Instead, Donald Trump wants to take $1.7 billion of your money to help his political allies, election deniers and insurrectionists.

He is obsessed with using the Presidency to steal from you and enrich himself and his cronies.
BREAKING: The Trump administration announces a $1.7 billion fund to compensate prosecuted allies after dropping a lawsuit against the IRS.
It's day 80 of Trump's illegal, unnecessary war. America is not safer, the Strait is still closed, gas prices are the highest they've been in 4 years—and there's no end in sight. Republicans need to stop blocking our War Powers Resolutions and help us end this chaos.
No money for healthcare. Can’t take care of daycare. No plans to bring down gas prices. But Republicans do think taxpayers should put $1 billion toward Trump’s golden ballroom. And shell out another $70 billion for ICE and Border Patrol. These people are out of touch.
NEWS: @baldwin.senate.gov and I are calling on the FAA to review how reduced crew size with certain airlines is impacting evacuation standards. In other words, you deserve to know how less flight attendants impacts your safety if disaster strikes. We're demanding answers.
Page 1 of Senators’ letter to FAA
Page 2 of Senators’ letter to FAA
Page 3 of Senators’ letter to FAA
When the brave men and women of our Armed Forces are given a mission, they never ask, “Why me?” They don’t ask, “But will I be safe?” They pack their rucksacks, lace up their boots and do what’s asked of them. Time after time. Tour after tour.
Amid his disastrous war of choice and self-created economic crisis, Donald Trump flew halfway around the world to flatter a foreign dictator—and came back with nothing to show for it. Nothing about that is "America first."
It was my honor to speak with SFC Jose Serrano today after successfully advocating for his wife’s release from ICE detention. I’ll never stop working to protect those who sacrifice for our nation.
Deisy Rivera Ortega is finally home. I’m thankful to DHS Secretary Mullin for heeding my personal call to release Deisy, the wife of Sgt. 1st Class Jose Serrano. But she—and so many others—should never have been in this situation to begin with. They fought for this country, we must fight for them.
CBS News: ICE releases the wife of U.S. Army soldier and Afghanistan veteran after monthlong detention
Legislation that would allow the year-round sale of E15 just passed the House! 🌽 With gas at $4.50 a gallon, this would help our farmers and give people a cheaper, cleaner option at the pump. If Trump is serious about lowering costs, he’d help make sure this passes the Senate.
Today, for the seventh time, Senate Republicans voted against a War Powers Resolution that would end Trump's illegal war. A war that has already cost $29 billion and driven up the cost of gas to $4.50 a gallon. Once again, Republicans chose Trump over the American people.
Help with daycare? Too expensive. Healthcare you can afford? Nope. But paying his friend millions of taxpayer dollars to paint the bottom of the Reflecting Pool? Absolutely. The corruption never ends.
The cost to repaint the Reflecting Pool in Washington, DC blue is now estimated to be over $13 million. Trump initially promised it would cost only $1.8 million. www.nytimes.com/2026/05/11/u...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
840 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 17 / 17