Mazie K. Hirono headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Hawaii
Born
November 3, 1947
Age 78
Phone
(202) 224-6361
Office
109 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Hawaii

Mazie K. Hirono

Mazie Keiko Hirono is an American lawyer and politician serving since 2013 as the junior United States senator from Hawaii. A member of the Democratic Party, Hirono previously served as a member of the United States House of Representatives for Hawaii's 2nd congressional district from 2007 to 2013. She has been the dean of Hawaii's congressional delegation since 2013, when Senator Daniel Akaka retired. Hirono also served as a member of the Hawaii House of Representatives from 1981 to 1994 and as Hawaii's tenth lieutenant governor from 1994 to 2002. She was the Democratic nominee for governor of Hawaii in 2002, but lost to Republican Linda Lingle.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 851
Yes29%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mazie K. Hirono headshot
Mazie K. Hirono
U.S. SenatorDemocratHawaii
SoupScore
Mazie K.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 61 sponsored · 386 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

With only a day left of open enrollment, 1.4 million fewer Americans have signed up for ACA health plans compared to this time last year — over 1,500 of them being from Hawaii. Our neighbors are going without coverage because Trump refuses to address his health care cost crisis.
The House passed a health care plan to extend the ACA tax credits for 3 years. Now it's up to Senate Republicans to decide. Do they want their constituents to be able to afford health care, or do they want to suck up to Donald Trump?
This regime is lying to you about what happened on January 6th, 2021. I was there. I saw the violent insurrection with my very eyes. Their lies will never erase the pain, terror, and damage inflicted on our democracy, our country, and those who lost loved ones.
Republicans claim to be focused on rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse. They aren’t. If they were, then they'd acknowledge the rampant corruption being carried out by this regime. Starting with the White House.
Donald Trump doesn't even have concepts of a plan for Venezuela, but he's already briefed big oil executives on how they make money from his invasion. Once again, he's prioritizing himself and his billionaire buddies over our democracy and the American people. apnews.com/article/trum...
This regime wants to transfer ED programs to federal agencies with no education experience or expertise. They've already tried this before and realized on their own that it does not work. Yet they are doing it again. Why? Because they do not care about your kids.
This does not have to happen. There is a vaccine to prevent whooping cough, but this regime prioritizes conspiracy theories over your health. Americans deserve to be healthy, not plagued with PREVENTABLE illnesses.
Republicans are doing what they do best: deflecting. Instead of finding a solution to the health care crisis they created, they want to distract you from the truth: health care costs are skyrocketing, and it's all their fault. www.politico.com/news/2025/12...
Protecting child health apparently no longer "aligns" with HHS's "missions or priorities". HHS just confirmed what I've been saying for months: This regime does not prioritize keeping our children or our nation healthy. www.washingtonpost.com/health/2025/...
Republicans love to talk about rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse. But why don't any of them pay attention to the rampant waste, fraud, and abuse coming from Trump? It's not like his lawlessness and abuse of power are hard to see.
Now that Trump’s gaudy ballroom is on the line, this administration suddenly claims to care about national security. Where was that concern when Pete Hegseth was using Signal to share details of a classified mission?
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-10End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationNOYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 17 / 18Next →