PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Martin Heinrich headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Mexico
Born
October 17, 1971
Age 54
Phone
(202) 224-5521
Office
709 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico

Martin Heinrich

Martin Trevor Heinrich is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from New Mexico, a seat he has held since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, Heinrich served as the U.S. representative from New Mexico's 1st congressional district from 2009 to 2013. He and fellow senator Ben Ray Luján are the co-deans of New Mexico's congressional delegation.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes34%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @MartinHeinrichFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Martin Heinrich headshot
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 47 sponsored · 263 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govDec 10(source)
To safeguard the lands, waters, and way of life in the Pecos from the dangers of future mining, the Forest Service must complete initial steps of the mineral withdrawal process. This is how we ensure that future generations can continue to benefit from this critical watershed.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govDec 10(source)
I agree with AG Torrez: Time is running out. The U.S. Department of the Interior's "solution" that would require the City of Las Cruces to cut it's groundwater use by 93% is NOT a solution. sourcenm.com/2024/12/10/m...
Mediation starts in Rio Grande legal fight  among New Mexico, Texas and Colorado  • Source New Mexico
The federal government and states of Colorado, New Mexico and Texas are back in mediation, which begins Tuesday in Washington D.C.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govDec 10(source)
Today, my legislation to help Good Samaritans clean up long-abandoned hardrock mines faces its final hurdle before it goes to the President's desk. I urge all of my colleagues in the House of Representatives to vote YES on this bipartisan, commonsense bill.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govDec 9(source)
Climate action is WAY cheaper than climate inaction. Democrats have made solid progress, but more is needed. And the longer we delay, the more expensive and catastrophic the consequences will be for future generations.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govDec 9(source)
If the Department of the Interior gets its way, Las Cruces won’t have the water it needs to function, and neither will Ag producers. We need the Biden administration to step in to resolve the TX v. NM case without catastrophic damage. www.abqjournal.com/news/article...
Mediation over Rio Grande water allocations set to begin Tuesday
Ahead of mediation over Rio Grande water use, New Mexico’s Attorney General is concerned the federal government will support stricter limits on groundwater pumping, which could inhibit the growth of s...
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govDec 9(source)
These guys literally want to take us back in time. Apparently making your neighborhood breathe dirty air is “great”, but American manufacturing jobs making EVs are “woke.” www.reuters.com/business/aut...
Exclusive: Trump may cancel US Postal Service electric mail truck contract, sources say
Donald Trump's transition team is considering canceling the United States Postal Service's contracts to electrify its delivery fleet, as part of a broader suite of executive orders targeting electric vehicles, according to three sources familiar with the plans.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govDec 8(source)
Apprenticeships are good for workers, businesses, and local economies. That's why I led bipartisan legislation to support apprentice and pre-apprentice programs like Sophia’s at SMART Local 49.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govDec 7(source)
The kids at Lincoln Elementary in Gallup, NM show up every day bright eyed and ready to learn – just like the students at all the 767 Title I schools in our state. Republicans’ Department of Education plans to slash funding for these schools slam a door in our kids’ faces.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govDec 6(source)
The only thing that New Mexicans battling chronic kidney disease should have to worry about is getting better. That’s why I’ve introduced legislation to protect those with kidney failure from being kicked off of their health care when they need it most. www.santafenewmexican.com/opinion/my_v...
Congress must deliver for people with kidney failure
For those in New Mexico battling chronic kidney disease, a brand-new treatment facility in Albuquerque has become a beacon of hope.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govDec 6(source)
Casting politics in terms of good and evil is dangerous and destructive. The "federal government" is your Social Security, it's your uncle's VA cancer treatment, it's the national park where your kids spent their vacation. We're better than this, America. subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eene...
E&E News: What’s with the online bromance between Elon Musk and Mike Lee?
The Tesla CEO and incoming Senate Energy and Natural Resources chair are bonding on X over efforts to overhaul an “evil” federal government.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govDec 6(source)
Republicans’ economic plan: 1. Use tariffs to hike up prices on food, appliances, and other everyday goods. 2. Give tax handouts to the super rich. 3. Cut health care and nutrition programs Americans rely on. Sounds great for their wealthy donors... & terrible for working families.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govDec 5(source)
Great to meet with folks from Protect Our Winters to highlight the progress we've made to protect our precious public lands and discuss the work ahead to tackle climate change and deliver a brighter future for the next generation.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govDec 5(source)
CONFIRMED! Sarah Davenport has built an impressive legal career in New Mexico and has strong roots in her home community of Las Cruces. Proud to have secured her confirmation and look forward to her taking the bench in the District of New Mexico.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govDec 5(source)
Tariffs won’t “bring back” American manufacturing—the investments Democrats have made in the last few years are already doing that. These tariffs are no more than a tax on hardworking families. www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-t...
Here's why Trump thinks tariffs are good for the U.S. — and what the experts say
President-elect Donald Trump is proposing sweeping new tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China as soon as he takes office. Here's why.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govDec 5(source)
New Mexicans rely on USPS to receive everything from paychecks to prescription medicine. I’m cosponsoring legislation that would require USPS to think twice before closing or downsizing rural mail processing facilities.
← Newer postsPosts page 48Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-12—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-12—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-10—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06—Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28—Confirm nomineeNOYES✕Nomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Bill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNO✕↔Amendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNO✕↔Amendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 17 / 18Next →