PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenHydeSmithFacebookInstagram
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 192 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byTina Smith
Burgess Everett@burgessev.bsky.socialJan 13(source)
New - Murphy, Schiff, Smith and Warren urge their Democratic colleagues to adopt populist platform “Our party’s anemic response to the rigging of our democracy and economy in favor of the ultra-wealthy has eroded our credibility with working people" www.semafor.com/article/01/1...
Exclusive: Progressive Democrats urge party to go populist in midterms
The senators used polling from both Democratic-aligned and GOP-aligned groups to argue that “bland policy proposals” won’t work.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJan 13(source)
ICE approaching a teenage girl and U.S. CITIZEN on her way to soccer practice and snooping around her car with giant guns is not making us safer.   All it does is terrorize our kids.
Reposted byTina Smith
Aaron Rupar@atrupar.comJan 10(source)
Sen. Tina Smith: "I don't know how I could vote for a funding bill for ICE and DHS when so much of what they are doing is illegal, is lawless."
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJan 9(source)
School districts and day care centers across the Twin Cities are closing tomorrow because of fear of ICE and intimidation. Hear me loud and clear ICE: Stay the hell AWAY from our schools.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJan 8(source)
All they have to do is tell Bondi and Patel to let it happen. Takes one phone call. We all saw the videos with our own eyes. We all know their narrative isn’t true, no matter how much they want it to be.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJan 8(source)
If Trump and Vance were truly confident in their (false) narrative around the ICE killing in Minneapolis, they’d allow a joint investigation with state law enforcement.
Reposted byTina Smith
The Washington Post@washingtonpost.comJan 7(source)
A frustrated Sen. Tina Smith (D) noted the ICE shooting took place only blocks from where George Floyd was murdered by police in 2020. Follow other responses and live updates:
Live updates: Walz urges peaceful protests after ICE officer fatally shoots woman in Minneapolis
An Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer fatally shot a 37-year-old woman during an operation in Minneapolis on Wednesday, federal authorities said.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJan 7(source)
Homeland Security’s description of what happened and the narrative they’re pushing clearly doesn’t match up with the videos we’re all seeing. They’re asking people not to believe what we can all see with our own eyes. I’ve been in contact with DHS demanding more information.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJan 7(source)
I want to express my deepest sympathy to the family and loved ones of the woman killed by ICE this morning. She should not have died today. This should not have happened. I can’t imagine the heartbreak you are going through and the grief you are enduring.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJan 7(source)
A US citizen has apparently been shot by ICE agents in Minneapolis. I’m gathering information, but the situation on the ground is volatile. ICE should leave now for everyone’s safety.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJan 7(source)
I’m aware of the reports of an ICE related shooting in Minneapolis and working as hard as I can to get answers. I’ll share any updates as I learn more.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJan 7(source)
Why won’t Speaker Johnson display this plaque thanking law enforcement for their heroic efforts to protect our Democracy on January 6?
Picture of a plaque honoring the law enforcement that protected the Capitol on January 6, 2021.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJan 6(source)
He can’t even grow the spine to put up a *commemorative plaque* honoring the police officers who protect him every single day. Add it to the laundry list of examples that prove he’s just Trump’s lap dog.
Scott MacFarlane
@macfarlanenews.bsky.social
Open post ↗
NEW: House Speaker Mike Johnson – after two years of deflecting questions on the matter – is now arguing that the legally-required January 6 plaque must be re-considered (more)
← Newer postsPosts page 15Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-06-24S.J. Res. 185 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50)
2026-06-24—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-24S.J. Res. 196 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-52)
2026-06-24—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-06-24—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (50-44)
2026-06-24—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-24—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2026-06-24—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-23H. Con. Res. 86 (119th)Accept House changesNONO✓Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48)
2026-06-23—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (67-30)
2026-06-22H.R. 6644 (119th)Accept House changesYESYES✓Motion Agreed to (85-5)
2026-06-18—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (48-39)
2026-06-18H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-8, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-17S. Res. 616 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 616NONO✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (44-50)
2026-06-17—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41)
2026-06-17—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (55-39)
2026-06-17—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41)
2026-06-16H.R. 6644 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (87-8)
2026-06-16S.J. Res. 172 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 172NONO✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-48)
2026-06-16S.J. Res. 190 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-48)
2026-06-15—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (48-43)
2026-06-11—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-43)
2026-06-11—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (49-44)
2026-06-10—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44)
2026-06-10—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (50-44)
2026-06-10—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2026-06-09—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2026-06-08—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Budgetary Discipline Re: Lee Amdt. No. 5804)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (50-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Motion (Wyden Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions)NONO✓Motion Rejected (48-51)
2026-06-05S. 1318 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Bill Passed (52-47)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schiff Amdt. No. 5740)NONO✓Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 5632)NONO✓Motion Rejected (53-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (45-53)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Cassidy Amdt. No. 5812)NONO✓Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Coons Amdt. No. 5457)NONO✓Motion Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Durbin Amdt. No. 5806)NONO✓Motion Rejected (48-51, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Booker Amdt. No. 5803)NONO✓Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 5485)NONO✓Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Sanders Amdt. No. 5451)NONO✓Motion Rejected (45-53, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04S. 2 (119th)Motion (Warnock Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions)NONO✓Motion Rejected (46-52)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Kim Amdt. No. 5545)NONO✓Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 5501)NONO✓Motion Rejected (51-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Graham Amdt. No. 5779)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 5556)NONO✓Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

Page 1 / 18Next →