Reposted byTina Smith
Sen. Tina Smith asked him about the high costs of fertilizer.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 843
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 189 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I get a kick out of the idea of Scott Bessent going to farmers and saying "I'm just like you!"
🎥: @acyn.bsky.social
Being a hedge fund billionaire landlord who rents out farmland doesn't make you a farmer. It makes you part of the problem!
Why is an insurrectionist rioter handling counterterrorism while we’re at war? Or at all?
They haven’t given up on this. They just want us to stop talking about it because it’s so flagrantly corrupt.
When the leader of the Proud Boys says Trump will keep trying to get his slush fund… we should take him at his word!
Pulte only got the job as acting Director of National Intelligence because he’s clearly willing to pursue baseless retribution against Trump’s perceived political enemies. What a joke – or at least it would be if this wasn’t such a serious job.
Absolutely zero credibility.
Interesting… said in the most Minnesota way possible
So we’re supposed to believe the guy who wants his face on a $250 bill suddenly is just going to drop his demand for a slush fund?
Happy Pride!
HAPPY PRIDE 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️
Reposted byTina Smith
🚨 BREAKING: A federal appeals court has ruled, in a 2-1 decision, that the Trump-Hegseth transgender military ban is likely unconstitutional, finding that the policy appears to be driven by a “bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group” and is “both arbitrary and based upon animus.” 1/3
Nothing makes someone look guiltier than forcing the Justice Department to promise never to investigate your taxes or prosecute you for anything they might find
Straight from DC to the State Capitol in solidarity with Minnesotans pushing for gun safety legislation. Enough is enough.
Hold the vote!
The Supreme Court did the bare minimum here, but Justice Thomas’ dissent misuses a law written in *1873* to justify banning mifepristone.
Women couldn’t vote, let alone control their own bodies. Seriously?
“Don’t worry buddy, Kristi Noem isn’t around here anymore.”
People I care a whole lot about rely on SSRIs to make their lives work. I don’t know where I would be without SSRIs.
Get your fucking hands and your crazy conspiracy theories out of our medicine cabinets.
Thank you to the staff and faculty for showing me the new geothermal systems!
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History843 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
843 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-19) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-41) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (81-15) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (21-75) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (15-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (14-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (42-53) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (44-51) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-41) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-41) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-38) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 34 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (24-73) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 41 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (27-70) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-44) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.