Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 782
Yes74%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 180 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

He’s not even good at lying because everyone knows we’ve been talking about health care for the entire month. He just knows if he let there be a vote on health insurance subsidies, it’d pass with bipartisan support.
Speaker Mike Johnson: Here’s the simple truth: The Democrat Shutdown is about NOTHING.

If you asked 100 different Democrats what their shutdown is about you would get 100 different answers.

Now Democrats have trapped themselves in the longest shutdown in U.S. history — and the American people are CONTINUING to pay the price.
Clarifying question: Does needlessly keeping food from working families make us great? Or is it keeping it from seniors on fixed incomes?
Nothing like a Gatsby party for your uber rich friends at Mar-A-Lago while millions of your neighbors get priced out of health insurance. @chrismurphyct.bsky.social, @warren.senate.gov and I just touched down in Florida because while Trump won’t fight for his neighbors, we will.
Photo of President Trump at a Great Gatsby party held at Mar-A-Lago.
Dear Leader is refusing to help hungry families buy food... and somehow that’s OUR fault because we were greedy enough to want to help Americans afford health care.
The only way out of this is to negotiate and we’ve been ready for a month. Stonewalling us just holds federal workers, our troops and hungry families hostage because Republicans don’t have a health care plan beyond “don’t be poor”
Reposted byTina Smith
I’ve been in Congress for shutdowns before, but this one is different. I’ve never witnessed a shutdown where the President of either party has told congressional leaders to not negotiate at all. He's choosing to raise health care costs for millions of families.
Are we living in the same timeline?
Q: Is any work being done on a Republican solution to the healthcare cliff? MIKE JOHNSON: When I say that Republicans have been working on a fix for healthcare, we've been doing this for years. We're doing right now what we have been doing.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
782 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-05-13S.J. Res. 130 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-53)
2026-05-13S.J. Res. 141 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (50-50)
2026-05-13S.J. Res. 132 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (48-52)
2026-05-13Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (54-45)
2026-05-13S. Res. 526 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (99-0, 3/5 majority required)
2026-05-13S.J. Res. 163 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 163NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (49-50)
2026-05-12End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2026-05-12Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (51-45)
2026-05-11End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-44)
2026-05-11S. Res. 690 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGYESResolution Agreed to (46-45)
2026-04-30S.J. Res. 184 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 184NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (47-50)
2026-04-30S. Res. 690 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-04-29S.J. Res. 99 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-50)
2026-04-29S.J. Res. 139 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (46-52)
2026-04-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (59-39)
2026-04-28S.J. Res. 124 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 124YESYESPoint of Order Well Taken (51-47)
2026-04-28S. Res. 690 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2026-04-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (54-37)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Accept House changesYESYESConcurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (49-49)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-50)
2026-04-23Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Padilla Amdt. No. 4855)NONOMotion Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Sanders Amdt. No. 5159)NONOMotion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (46-52)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNOAmendment Rejected (25-73)
2026-04-23Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Markey Amdt. No. 5001)NONOMotion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hawley Amdt. No. 4794)YESYESMotion Rejected (50-48, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Kennedy Amdt. No. 5414)YESYESMotion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Alsobrooks Amdt. No. 5294)NONOMotion Rejected (47-51, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 4956)NONOMotion Rejected (47-51, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hirono Amdt. No. 4884)NONOMotion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (98-0)
2026-04-22Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Ossoff Amdt. No. 4897)NONOMotion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Lujan Amdt. No. 4798)NONOMotion Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 4799)NONOMotion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22S.J. Res. 114 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 114NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (46-51)
2026-04-21S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2026-04-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (47-46)
2026-04-16End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-48)
2026-04-16H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (50-49)
2026-04-15H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49)
2026-04-15H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (51-48)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 138 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 138NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (36-63)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 32 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 32NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (40-59)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 123 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 123NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (47-52)
2026-04-14Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-47)
2026-04-14End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2026-04-14Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-46)
2026-04-13End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-03-26H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

Page 1 / 16Next →