Reminder that NONE of these workers need to be fired because of this shutdown — Trump is just using them as pawns because he views people as expendable if it serves his interests.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
A couple in their early 60s in Duluth, MN making $66,000 will pay an EXTRA $252 every single month to get health insurance if we don’t get a shutdown deal.
A single mother in Marshall, Minnesota making $40,000 will pay an EXTRA $140 every single month to get health insurance for herself and her two kids if we don’t get a shutdown deal.
American women and children need health insurance they can afford. You’re shutting down the government because you don’t want to work with us to stop skyrocketing costs, and that’s hurting everyone.
Come back to Washington and let’s talk.
Reposted byTina Smith
If Republicans don’t act 24 million Americans will be devastated by sky rocketing health care costs.
Speaker Johnson needs to call his people back and stop covering up for pedophiles.
Reposted byTina Smith
This is out of hand. These agents are there to cause trouble and violence, not to keep people safe. These are the scenes that play out in war torn, destitute countries - not America.
If ICE thinks it's okay to assault a pastor in broad daylight, imagine what they're doing in the dark.
I got their letter, and I’m not mad — just disappointed.
Don’t send me a damn letter, come to Washington and let’s get this fixed.
Reposted byTina Smith
Trump keeps saying he needs to send federal agents in to protect Chicago because the Police aren't doing the job.
You know what makes it hard for our city's brave police officers to do their jobs?
Trump's agents throwing tear gas at them.
You’ll never be able to convince me ripping an American citizen out of their Chicago apartment in the dead of night, zip tying their hands and refusing to let them call their lawyer is ‘America First’
Weird how that didn’t make the cut.
“I honestly feel in that group of people where I will probably drop health insurance”
What kind of country do we live in that we can’t agree to help people like CHILDCARE PROVIDERS see their doctor?
Reposted byTina Smith
Whitehouse: What became of the $50,000 in cash that the FBI gave to Mr. Homan?
Bondi: The investigation of Mr. Homan was subjected to a full review They found no evidence of wrongdoing.
Reposted byTina Smith
Every day Republicans are choosing to keep the government closed rather than lower your health care costs.
Did Mike Johnson just call MTG stupid?
Reposted byTina Smith
FACT FOCUS: Democrats did not shut down the government to give health care to illegal immigrants.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History851 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
851 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-04 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-09-02 | S. 2296 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-14, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (71-23) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (72-22) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-35) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-42) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (78-17) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-19) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-41) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (81-15) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (21-75) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (15-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (14-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (42-53) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (44-51) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-41) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-41) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-38) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 34 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (24-73) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 41 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (27-70) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.