Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

We are going to see unheard of levels of spin after today’s inflation report – and they are going to do something unfathomably insane to try and wrestle media attention away from it.
Installing a crank economist to only publish favorable or distorted data on the economy (inflation, jobs numbers, etc.)   Textbook authoritarianism – mum from my GOP colleagues.
🚨 Trump's new BLS nominee E.J. Antoni suggests pausing the monthly jobs report: Until it is corrected, the BLS should suspend issuing the monthly job reports but keep publishing the more accurate, though less timely, quarterly data
Many VA employees are veterans themselves. Canceling their union contracts is not only insulting to their service, but it’s going to make the quality of care for our veterans worse. These men and women made incredible sacrifices for our country. This is not how we repay them.
The VA terminating the union contracts of their workers is an ambush on the people who care for our veterans. The Trump admin may think they can silence anyone who pushes back against their unlawful and anti-worker actions, but we aren’t going anywhere. aflcio.org/press/releas...
Reminder that insurrectionists attacked police officers on January 6th and Trump pardoned every one of them.   This one wanted to go after the officer he attacked.
A Jan. 6 defendant, convicted for the brutal beating of an MPD officer, lost his bid to FOIA records about the victim officer — in part because Trump's pardon made it moot Webster, a former NYPD officer, had been sentenced to 10 years before the pardon ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-07-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-49)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (54-44)
2025-07-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-28End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-07-28Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-39)
2025-07-28End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-07-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-48)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-07-23End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-47)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (49-47)
2025-07-23End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (48-47)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (49-47)
2025-07-23End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-47)
2025-07-23H.R. 3944 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-41)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (61-35)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-07-22H.R. 3944 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (91-7, 3/5 majority required)
2025-07-22H.R. 3944 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-48)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-21End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (44-43)
2025-07-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (46-36)
2025-07-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-34)
2025-07-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (57-31)
2025-07-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2025-07-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-43)
2025-07-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (51-48)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (47-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (51-47)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-51)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 9 / 18Next →