Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byTina Smith
Under 5 U.S.C §2954, HSGAC has the unique authority to request information from any executive agency that falls within our Committee’s oversight jurisdiction. We are using that authority to request the Epstein files from AG Bondi. The American people deserve transparency.
I hear about this all the time from constituents. People are repulsed by the inhumanity of this and how innocent people are being targeted when they are just trying to figure out how to get just a little bit of food – literally starving to death. I stand firmly against that.
Civilians in Gaza have been turned into a weapon of war in a way that is despicable. The point of this letter and the point of what many of us have been doing for months is to put pressure on the Netanyahu government to change their policy.
The humanitarian situation in Gaza is untenable. Netanyahu needs to take responsibility to solve this problem instead of continually pushing the blame off on others. The hostages need to be returned. We need an end to the fighting.
Children are starving. Civilian deaths continue to mount. Hostages are still held. Today I led 43 of my Senate colleagues in demanding the State Department work urgently to end the humanitarian disaster in Gaza. This cannot continue.
Medicare and Medicaid provide life-saving health insurance to the folks who need it. Millions of Americans are better off, but Republicans brazenly gutted that care to cater to their rich friends and big corporations who'll never know what it's like to struggle. Shame on them.
On the 60th anniversary of Medicare and Medicaid, Protect Our Care is highlighting the catastrophic impact the GOP tax bill will have on these life-saving programs.
60 Years Later, Medicare and Medicaid Hang On By A Thread After Republicans Pass Devastating Tax Bill
Reposted byTina Smith
60 years ago today, Medicaid and Medicare transformed health care in America. Today, the GOP is rolling back access to care to pad the pockets of the wealthy few. We won't stand by while they make care less affordable and our families less healthy. You deserve better.
The laws of war don’t just apply when it’s convenient.   Hamas is a brutal terrorist organization. But Netanyahu doesn’t get a pass. He is responsible for the pervasive starvation and famine, which is morally repugnant.   Feed Gaza.
If Trump were actually the strong-man he pretends to be, he'd tell Netanyahu to allow the food to flow, so innocent Palestinian children don't die of starvation. Talking about how sad this is in between rounds at his golf course in Scotland is weak beyond words.   Feed Gaza.
I've been in touch with Mayor Carter and am monitoring the situation in St. Paul. A coordinated, malicious attack on one of Minnesota’s biggest cities is disruptive, but I’m grateful to Governor Walz and Mayor Carter for their leadership, and to all the experts working to get to the bottom of this.
Headline from the Star Tribune: Major cyberattack hits St. Paul, shuts down many services
Years of painstaking work finally paid off. Democrats and Republicans alike agreed that we need to address the housing crisis in this country. Next stop: Senate floor.
Tweet from @rcobooth: the Senate's big housing package just moved unanimously out of the banking committee
Reposted byTina Smith
24 million women rely on Medicaid to access basic health care. Routine physicals, maternal and postpartum care, birth control, childbirth, cancer screenings. Republicans have sacrificed their health to make a handful of billionaires richer.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-07-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-49)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (54-44)
2025-07-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-28End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-07-28Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-39)
2025-07-28End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-07-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-48)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-07-23End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-47)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (49-47)
2025-07-23End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (48-47)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (49-47)
2025-07-23End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-47)
2025-07-23H.R. 3944 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-41)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (61-35)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-07-22H.R. 3944 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (91-7, 3/5 majority required)
2025-07-22H.R. 3944 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-48)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-21End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (44-43)
2025-07-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (46-36)
2025-07-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-34)
2025-07-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (57-31)
2025-07-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2025-07-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-43)
2025-07-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (51-48)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (47-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (51-47)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-51)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 9 / 18Next →