Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 783
Yes74%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 183 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

NEWS: For the first time in over a decade (!), robust, bipartisan legislation to address homelessness nationwide was just introduced in the Senate.
Graphic stating: Reducing Homelessness Through Program Reform Act (Bipartisan). Introduced by Senators Tina Smith (D-MN) and Mike Rounds (R-SD).
Just so we’re clear, he wants us to pay more for goods we get from Brazil because he wants to save a foreign political crony on trial for corruption. Not seeing the “America First” mentality here…
BREAKING: While Texans hold their breath as search and rescue personnel look for survivors of this weekend’s deadly floods, the Trump Admin is quietly trying to repeal federal flood protections.
Equal protection under law. The right to due process. The promise that everyone born on American soil is treated as a citizen. The 14th Amendment is clear: Trump is not a king. He can’t re-write it – no matter how hard he may try.
157 years ago, the 14th Amendment was ratified—guaranteeing equal protection and due process under law and birthright citizenship. I’ll continue to stand up against Trump Administration’s illegal attempts to unilaterally end birthright citizenship and roll back civil rights.
Wrote last week’s “five things” email for all the Republican sellouts (not sure if DOGE still does this anymore since the breakup?)
Email to DOGE stating: What I Did for Work Last Week
• Kicked millions of people off their health insurance (also forced many rural hospitals to close)
• Took food assistance away from hungry families
• Defunded Planned Parenthood
• Slashed taxes for billionaires and big corporations
• Added five trillion dollars to the national debt
Best regards from your favorite corporate sellout,
[INSERT NAME HERE]
Republican United States Senator
One in four nursing homes have said they’ll close facilities because of the “Big, Beautiful Bill” – and they passed it anyway.   Talk to, essentially, ANY families who have moved someone into long term care recently. There’s not exactly a surplus of facilities around today…
So much progress will be erased by this bill — millions lose health insurance, and for what? To give Jeff Bezos another tax break?
17 million people’s health insurance is not waste. If you’re looking for frauds, look at all the Republicans who promised not to cut Medicaid but did it anyways.
Now it’s up to all of us to continue the fight. As this bill returns to the House, make your voices heard. We say no to the largest role back in health care in our nation’s history, and the biggest transfer of wealth in modern times.
In Minnesota alone, nearly 200,000 people will lose their health insurance. Rural hospitals will be forced to close. Planned Parenthood will lose its funding and have to shutter clinics.
What Republicans did here is simple. They voted to kick 16 million people off health insurance while giving massive tax breaks to billionaires and corporations, and managed to still raise the debt by a staggering $5 trillion.
I worked at Planned Parenthood. They diagnose cancers while still treatable. They help women decide what birth control works for them. They help those working through mental health challenges.   Defunding them just harms people who already struggle to find places to get care.
It takes a serious level of cruelty to not only kick millions off their health insurance, but simultaneously tell you where you can and can’t go to get a Pap smear or breast cancer screening — if you’re deemed worthy enough to keep your health insurance in the first place.
🚨The GOP provision to DEFUND Planned Parenthood is staying in the Big Ugly bill. Clinics will shutter. Women will lose access to cancer screenings, birth control, and basic care. I will be forcing a vote to try to strip it out. Fight like hell. We need to kill this bill.
Reposted byTina Smith
🚨The GOP provision to DEFUND Planned Parenthood is staying in the Big Ugly bill. Clinics will shutter. Women will lose access to cancer screenings, birth control, and basic care. I will be forcing a vote to try to strip it out. Fight like hell. We need to kill this bill.
Just when I thought the big, beautiful bill couldn't get any worse, it has. If R's amendments go through, the number of Minnesotans losing health insurance will top 300,000.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
783 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (49-51)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Schumer Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (47-53)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Decision of the Chair H.R. 1YESYESDecision of Chair Sustained (53-47)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Decision of the Chair S.Amdt. 2360 to H.R. 1 (No short title on file)YESYESDecision of Chair Sustained (53-47)
2025-06-28H.R. 1 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49)
2025-06-27S.J. Res. 59 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 59NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2025-06-26Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-06-25End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-06-25Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (56-40)
2025-06-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-06-24Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (61-35)
2025-06-23End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (58-33)
2025-06-18Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-18Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-06-18End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-46)
2025-06-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (68-30)
2025-06-17Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-06-17Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (57-40)
2025-06-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-06-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (46-39)
2025-06-16End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (44-33)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (67-27, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (67-30)
2025-06-12Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Amdt. No. 2307)YESYESMotion Agreed to (64-33, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Failed (45-52)
2025-06-12Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-44)
2025-06-11S.J. Res. 54 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 54NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (39-56)
2025-06-11S.J. Res. 53 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 53NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (39-56)
2025-06-11S. 1582 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (68-30, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-11End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-43)
2025-06-10End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-44)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-44)
2025-06-10End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-41)
2025-06-09End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-06-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-41)
2025-06-05End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2025-06-05Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-05End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-43)
2025-06-05Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-04Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (57-38)
2025-06-04Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (48-46)
2025-06-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-06-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (72-26)
2025-06-03End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (59-36)
2025-06-03End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (59-37)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 10 / 16Next →