PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenHydeSmithFacebookInstagram
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJul 15(source)
The Epstein files don’t exist… but also they were on Pam Bondi’s desk... but we aren’t releasing them because again, they’re not real... but if they were real, Obama/Biden/Clinton wrote them.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJul 10(source)
This bill would help states address our homelessness crisis on a bipartisan basis and in a way that works across the nation - whether that's in a small town, big city, suburb or Tribal community.
Smith, Rounds Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Empower States and Communities to Reduce Homelessness - Senator Tina Smith
WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.) and Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) today introduced the Reducing Homelessness Through Program Reform Act, legislation to...
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJul 10(source)
NEWS: For the first time in over a decade (!), robust, bipartisan legislation to address homelessness nationwide was just introduced in the Senate.
Graphic stating: Reducing Homelessness Through Program Reform Act (Bipartisan). Introduced by Senators Tina Smith (D-MN) and Mike Rounds (R-SD).
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJul 9(source)
Just so we’re clear, he wants us to pay more for goods we get from Brazil because he wants to save a foreign political crony on trial for corruption. Not seeing the “America First” mentality here…
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJul 9(source)
BREAKING: While Texans hold their breath as search and rescue personnel look for survivors of this weekend’s deadly floods, the Trump Admin is quietly trying to repeal federal flood protections.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJul 9(source)
Equal protection under law. The right to due process. The promise that everyone born on American soil is treated as a citizen. The 14th Amendment is clear: Trump is not a king. He can’t re-write it – no matter how hard he may try.
Senator Tim Kaine
@kaine.senate.gov
Open post ↗
157 years ago, the 14th Amendment was ratified—guaranteeing equal protection and due process under law and birthright citizenship. I’ll continue to stand up against Trump Administration’s illegal attempts to unilaterally end birthright citizenship and roll back civil rights.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJul 8(source)
Wrote last week’s “five things” email for all the Republican sellouts (not sure if DOGE still does this anymore since the breakup?)
Email to DOGE stating: What I Did for Work Last Week • Kicked millions of people off their health insurance (also forced many rural hospitals to close) • Took food assistance away from hungry families • Defunded Planned Parenthood • Slashed taxes for billionaires and big corporations • Added five trillion dollars to the national debt Best regards from your favorite corporate sellout, [INSERT NAME HERE] Republican United States Senator
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govJul 7(source)
One in four nursing homes have said they’ll close facilities because of the “Big, Beautiful Bill” – and they passed it anyway.   Talk to, essentially, ANY families who have moved someone into long term care recently. There’s not exactly a surplus of facilities around today…
← Newer postsPosts page 35Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-30—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-07-30—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-07-29—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (50-49)
2025-07-29—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (54-44)
2025-07-29—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-07-29—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-29—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-07-29—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-28—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-07-28—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (50-39)
2025-07-28—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-07-24—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-48)
2025-07-24—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-24—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-07-24—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-07-23—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47)
2025-07-23—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (49-47)
2025-07-23—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-47)
2025-07-23—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (49-47)
2025-07-23—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47)
2025-07-23H.R. 3944 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8)
2025-07-23—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-23—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (52-41)
2025-07-22—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (61-35)
2025-07-22—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-07-22H.R. 3944 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (91-7, 3/5 majority required)
2025-07-22H.R. 3944 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-48)
2025-07-22—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-22—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-07-22—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-21—End debateNOT_VOTINGYES—Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-43)
2025-07-17—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-36)
2025-07-17—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-34)
2025-07-17—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-31)
2025-07-17—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2025-07-17—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-43)
2025-07-17—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Bill Passed (51-48)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (47-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Motion to Table Agreed to (51-47)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeNONO✓Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 9 / 18Next →