Arresting and detaining SEIU leader and American citizen David Huerta is sickening.
This is not how we do things in America. We do not accept these kinds of abuses of power.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
What’s happening in Los Angeles right now is yet another example of Donald Trump using the powers of the federal government to attack and intimidate his political enemies.
It’s despicable.
The breakup has been quieter today but let’s remember what they’re arguing about — that despite all the talk about cuts, Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill will add $2.6 trillion to the national debt.
It’s fiscal insanity, and only a matter of time before the dam broke.
Who gets custody of JD in the divorce?
As a grandma (and on behalf of toddlers everywhere) I’ll say this Musk/Trump tantrum is worse than anything I’ve ever seen.
Trump could use this
Does anyone have popcorn??
If it helps tank the “Big, Beautiful Bill” I’m all for it.
Break ups are really hard but I sure do love watching the one between the Trump and Musk play out publicly.
Reposted byTina Smith
Sen. Tina Smith calls out the Trump administration’s withdrawal from the MPD federal consent decree, a critical tool for police reform after the DOJ confirmed patterns of abuse. The fight for justice continues. - spokesman-recorder.com/2025/06/05/s...
Hopped on WCCO Radio this morning to talk about the ‘Big Beautiful Bill’.
Listen, I’m all for efficiency, but ripping Americans’ health care and food assistance away to give tax breaks to giant corporations and their rich executives isn’t fighting waste and fraud.
That’s just a grift.
Reposted byTina Smith
The GOP reconciliation bill would cut $300 billion from SNAP, starving millions of families.
This is a matter of life or death for working families. And while billionaires win, the rest of us lose.
Democrats won't stand for this, and neither should Republicans.
Your bill is the single largest health care rollback in American history.
If you’re going to do it, at least have the guts to own it. Federal Medicaid $ does not cover undocumented people, period. Surely you know this.
Hell must be frozen over.
Reposted byTina Smith
“One Big Beautiful Bill”?
Try one big, bold-faced lie.
They swore this mess wouldn’t add to the deficit…but the nonpartisan budget office says otherwise.
$2.4 TRILLION added to the deficit—and for what?
Tax cuts for the rich.
Republicans are hell-bent on making it harder for a whole lot of people, including women, to vote. This fight is far from over.
It’s important to celebrate the strides we've taken with the 19th Amendment, but we have to recognize that the fight for universal suffrage began long before 1920 and continues today.
Harvey Milk served in the Navy for 4 years. He was forced out because he was gay.
Hegseth should focus on the chronic mismanagement of the Pentagon under his (hopefully limited) tenure and protecting those who serve instead of scoring political points by demonizing a former servicemember.
Pete Hegseth can't go a single day without making headlines for something ridiculous.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History851 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
851 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-44) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-39) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-41) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (61-35) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (91-7, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-21 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-43) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-36) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-34) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-31) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-43) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (51-48) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.