All parties in this conflict need to move forward to end the violence.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 789
Yes74%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 183 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Very welcome news out of the Middle East today.
Hopeful for a ceasefire, the return of hostages, humanitarian aid to civilians in Gaza and safety and security in Israel.
Busy day in Washington — needed a big refuel that only a maple bacon donut could provide.
As it should be!
We just secured funding for ReConnect Rondo, a community-driven organization working to revitalize the Rondo neighborhood, to take the next steps needed to get the project ready for construction.
Another reason to be glad I didn’t go for dry January. Love you Vikings.
I’ve broken out the wine.
Here in Washington, one hour out and ready for the game — experiencing that mixture of anticipation and dread so familiar to all Vikings fans.
Every time I visit Rondo, I’m reminded of the strength, vision, and community spirit that define this neighborhood.
Their commitment to restoring what was lost is what makes this project so meaningful. I’m honored to support them on this journey.
The Rondo neighborhood is the center of St. Paul's Black community and lost more than 1,000 homes + businesses when I-94 was built. A land bridge over the interstate could address the historical harm caused by its construction.
And we’re one step closer to making that happen.
It's Postmaster General DeJoy's responsibility to provide reliable service in Minnesota.
He has a lot of work to do to fix these issues, and I won't stop pressing him until it's done.
When I asked postal leadership about this, they told me it was the first they heard of it.
These are the same people who repeatedly tell me everything is fine with service in Minnesota, and that their data would say if there were big disruptions.
This is beyond unacceptable.
Parts of Cook County, MN have gone without mail delivery since 2024.
People have been waiting for essential needs like prescriptions, Social Security checks, and more — and they were turned away when they tried to pick up their mail from the post office.
Wanted to share a video (w/ permission) of a mother and her two sons who were split up during the Afghanistan withdrawal who we were able to reunite in Minnesota.
Masouma and her sons have been separated for 3+ years. Seeing them together again warms my heart and brings tears to my eyes.
A little cold won’t keep me from sticking up for Minnesotans.
Beautiful service for a wonderful man. So thankful I was able to be here for it.
Rest in peace, President Carter.
I called for DOJ to investigate RealPage + other companies engaged in this practice in March 2023 with @warren.senate.gov, @markey.senate.gov and @sanders.senate.gov.
Glad to see more action taking on corporate landlords who illegally coordinate to reduce competition + inflate the cost of rent.
Artificially inflating rent is just wrong. When corporate landlords collude with each other and use algorithms to keep units empty and prices high, renters get stuck in a doom spiral of unaffordability.
But that’s exactly what these landlords do.
Upgrades will include making structural steel repairs and replacing deteriorated sections – and replacing sidewalks so we can all keep enjoying Park Point.
Between this and the complete replacement of the Blatnik Bridge, the future of Duluth’s infrastructure is bright.
Seeing ships from around the world traverse under the Aerial Lift Bridge and dock in Duluth never gets old. It's a staple of the Northland.
And we have some good news. Senator Klobuchar and I secured funding to make repairs to keep the bridge operational for years to come.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History789 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
789 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Motion (Blunt Rochester Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-06-30 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive Section 302(F) of the CBA Re: Amdt. No. 2696) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Motion (Reed Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Motion (Lujan Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Motion (Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Motion (Wyden Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Motion (Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Motion (Schumer Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Decision of the Chair H.R. 1 | YES | YES | ✓ | Decision of Chair Sustained (53-47) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Decision of the Chair S.Amdt. 2360 to H.R. 1 (No short title on file) | YES | YES | ✓ | Decision of Chair Sustained (53-47) |
| 2025-06-28 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-06-27 | S.J. Res. 59 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 59 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-06-26 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-25 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-06-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-40) |
| 2025-06-24 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (61-35) |
| 2025-06-23 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (58-33) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-46) |
| 2025-06-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (68-30) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-40) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-39) |
| 2025-06-16 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-33) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-27, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (67-30) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Amdt. No. 2307) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Agreed to (64-33, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (45-52) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 54 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 54 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 53 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 53 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (68-30, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-11 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-41) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-41) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-38) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.