Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I served as Minnesota’s Lt. Governor before coming to the Senate in 2018, where I champion progressive causes like: -- Expanding the Supreme Court -- Abortion rights -- Housing as a human right -- Fighting corporate greed
Later, I was VP of Planned Parenthood – North Central States, where every day I saw people walk through the doors of our clinic fully capable of making their own decisions about abortion, their bodies and their lives without some politician interfering.
Hello (again) Bluesky! I’m going to start posting here again, because that other app has become a disaster. But first, I want to introduce myself. My name is Tina Smith, and I’m a proud United States Senator for Minnesota… ⬇️
Cancelled/delayed flights are costly and stressful, especially when traveling to visit loved ones. Excellent news from the Biden-Harris Administration as we enter the holiday season.
Airlines in the United States are now required to give passengers cash refunds if their flight is significantly delayed or canceled, even if that person does not explicitly ask for a refund. cnn.it/3NGS0lE
Our housing crisis can't be solved by just one level of government. It's going to take all of us. We need to come together at every level - from local governments all the way up to the United States Senate - to ensure everyone has a quality, affordable place to call home.
I’ve long advocated for more support for beginning and emerging farmers. I chaired a hearing on it. I sponsor legislation to reauthorize this grant program. I have legislation to increase land access, capital access, and market access for underserved farmers.
This is a matter of national security, food security, and the strength and vitality of rural America. Agriculture is a driving force in America’s economy, and this grant will make sure our Ag economy is strong as the next generation of farmers takes over.
The average age of a producer in the United States is 58, and in Minnesota it’s 57. And of course, this number increases every year. That in a nutshell is why we need to invest in the next generation of farmers, so this country’s agriculture production continues to work.
Corporate landlords have no right to exploit American renters just trying to find a place they are proud to call home. That's why @aoc.bsky.social and I introduced the Homes Act - to empower communities with new, affordable housing options, and to protect tenants' rights.
We know there’s more work ahead. We need to solve this problem once and for all.I introduced the Housing for All Veterans Act, which would guarantee a housing voucher to every veteran who needs one. We’ll finish the job and make sure everyone has a place to call home.
In the past 15 years, the federal government and communities like ours have committed to ending veteran homelessness. Senator Klobuchar and I pushed for the increased federal funding that helped fuel this work in Hennepin County and across Minnesota, and we are seeing results.
BREAKING: Veteran homelessness in Hennepin County just reached ‘functional zero’. This milestone is years in the making. Now, we should take what's working in Minnesota and implement it on a national scale.
The Biden-Harris Administration says help is on the way, and the head of FEMA has been embedded in Florida at the state emergency operations center to stay briefed by local and state officials. Our entire country is behind them.
Absolutely devastating – as we begin to see more heartbreaking images of the damage Hurricane Milton has done to Florida, just remember: Florida won't rebuild alone.
This project shows what’s possible when the federal government partners with states, cities and nonprofits to create housing for the good of the community. Let's empower communities to build more housing like this by passing my Homes Act.
There isn’t enough safe, affordable, quality housing in Greater Minnesota. Yesterday, I toured Brewery Creek Apartments, which will provide 52 affordable units of housing — half of which are set aside for young people experiencing homelessness around Duluth.
This wouldn’t be possible without the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the advocates and utilities who are making Minnesota a leader in the clean energy transition. I was excited to join folks up in Hermantown to celebrate!
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-06-04Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hassan Amdt. No. 5535)NONOMotion Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04S. 2 (119th)Motion (Ossoff Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (47-50)
2026-06-04Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 5514)NONOMotion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 5512)NONOMotion Rejected (53-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Tillis Amdt. No. 5452)NONOMotion Rejected (15-84)
2026-06-04S. 2 (119th)Motion (Schumer motion to commit S.2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (49-50)
2026-06-03S. 2 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2026-06-03S.J. Res. 188 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (46-53)
2026-06-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-46)
2026-06-02End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2026-06-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-46)
2026-06-01End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-05-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-47)
2026-05-19S.J. Res. 185 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 185NONOMotion to Discharge Agreed to (50-47)
2026-05-19End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-47)
2026-05-19Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (52-38)
2026-05-19End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (57-38)
2026-05-18S. Res. 690 (119th)Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (46-43)
2026-05-14S. Res. 690 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-05-13S.J. Res. 130 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-53)
2026-05-13S.J. Res. 141 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (50-50)
2026-05-13S.J. Res. 132 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (48-52)
2026-05-13Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (54-45)
2026-05-13S. Res. 526 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (99-0, 3/5 majority required)
2026-05-13S.J. Res. 163 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 163NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (49-50)
2026-05-12End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2026-05-12Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (51-45)
2026-05-11End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-44)
2026-05-11S. Res. 690 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGYESResolution Agreed to (46-45)
2026-04-30S.J. Res. 184 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 184NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (47-50)
2026-04-30S. Res. 690 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-04-29S.J. Res. 99 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-50)
2026-04-29S.J. Res. 139 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (46-52)
2026-04-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (59-39)
2026-04-28S.J. Res. 124 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 124YESYESPoint of Order Well Taken (51-47)
2026-04-28S. Res. 690 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2026-04-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (54-37)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Accept House changesYESYESConcurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (49-49)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-50)
2026-04-23Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Padilla Amdt. No. 4855)NONOMotion Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Sanders Amdt. No. 5159)NONOMotion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (46-52)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNOAmendment Rejected (25-73)
2026-04-23Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Markey Amdt. No. 5001)NONOMotion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hawley Amdt. No. 4794)YESYESMotion Rejected (50-48, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Kennedy Amdt. No. 5414)YESYESMotion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Alsobrooks Amdt. No. 5294)NONOMotion Rejected (47-51, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 4956)NONOMotion Rejected (47-51, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hirono Amdt. No. 4884)NONOMotion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 18Next →