Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 789
Yes74%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 184 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Workers bailed out the Big 3 auto manufacturers during the Great Recession to keep the companies afloat. Now these companies make billions in profit while workers see stagnant wages.   That's not okay.   I stand with striking Minnesota and Wisconsin United Auto Workers in Hudson.
U.S. Senator Tina Smith smiling for a group photo with UAW workers who are holding signs from their strike.
This sustainable, solar-powered structure will house MIGIZI’s programs, including the Green Jobs program, which prepares Native students for careers in STEM and clean energy through an Indigenous lens.
MIGIZI makes sure that Native youth in the Twin Cities have the opportunity to connect with their cultures, build careers and be community leaders.   Today they opened the doors to a new facility.
Republicans stole two Supreme Court seats and appointed justices who flat out ignore precedent to do the bidding of Big Oil, Wall Street… really any right-wing, dark-money group with deep pockets. We need to expand the Court.
We owe it to Tribal Nations and Native families to do more. We need to pass the Truth and Healing Commission on Indian Boarding School Policies in the United States Act to take full accounting of what happened and help families heal.
Understanding the generational trauma of boarding schools opens us up to the broader dialogue about addressing and reconciling historical injustices.   That’s why I am so glad to see Secretary Haaland spearheading an effort to do just that.
Her mother spent time at boarding schools. Jean spent seven years in boarding schools. She rarely saw her parents and was detached from Tribal culture, a burden she carries to this day. She’s always known she wanted to provide more for her children – including a real education.
Jean was sent to three boarding schools, including one at Fort Totten in Devil’s Lake, North Dakota. Four girls shared an 8ft x 10ft room. They were silent in the cafeteria. They couldn't be outside without permission. They were shoved by teachers for visiting in the hall.
Native American families carry the generational trauma of boarding schools, where the federal government systematically tried to erase their culture. It’s one of our nation’s greatest injustices.   Let’s talk about Jean Brunkow, who is part of one of those families.
Autoworkers made huge sacrifices to keep the Big 3 auto manufacturers afloat in the lead up to the 2008 financial crisis. The Big 3 wouldn’t be here (making staggering profits, I might add) if it wasn’t for workers. They deserve fair wages and benefits.
Racial justice and economic justice go hand-in-hand. I spoke with Black entrepreneurs about how access to capital is key for those looking to improve their business and community. Investing in Black communities means expanding that access and creating opportunity for everyone.
Left to right: Entrepreneur Houston White Jr., Business Owner and Therapist Anissa Keyes, and U.S. Senator Tina Smith seated on stools on stage during a panel discussion on Black Entrepreneurship in Minnesota at the MinnPost Festival.
My work – from fighting for reproductive rights to expanding access to mental health care and building a clean energy transition – is rooted in my experience as a working mom and organizer. Glad to join Samantha Bee at the MinnPost Festival to talk about my journey to the Senate!
U.S. Senator Tina Smith sits on a stage, speaking with comedian Samantha Bee at the MinnPost Festival
The problem isn’t workers. The problem isn’t EVs. The problem isn’t unions.   Those are scapegoats the Big 3 wants to use to distract the public. The real problem is companies stiffing their workers – UAW is making sure that doesn’t happen.
But now these companies are making huge profits, so why aren’t the workers who rescued them getting their fair share?   Families sacrificed to save companies that are now immensely profitable.   They’re owed the dignity of fair wages and benefits.
During the leadup to the 2008 financial crisis, UAW conceded benefits and wages to the Big 3 auto manufacturers to help bail them out. Workers like Ryder trusted these companies – workers knew the companies were in dire straits and wanted to pitch in and keep them alive.
Ryder began working at Ford in 1994 when he was just 19 years old. He became a welder in 2016 and leads a maintenance team.   I think his perspective on this strike is getting lost in the shuffle of media coverage on this current strike.
The UAW is in his blood. Ryder’s grandmother worked at a Ford plant in New York. His father did too, until a plant closure forced them to move to Michigan.   He remembers the UAW strike of the 1980s. His father never crossed the picket line – he painted houses to make ends meet.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
789 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Blunt Rochester Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (48-52)
2025-06-30Motion (Motion to Waive Section 302(F) of the CBA Re: Amdt. No. 2696)NONOMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Reed Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (48-52)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Lujan Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (49-51)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (48-52)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Wyden Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (47-53)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (49-51)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Schumer Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (47-53)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Decision of the Chair H.R. 1YESYESDecision of Chair Sustained (53-47)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Decision of the Chair S.Amdt. 2360 to H.R. 1 (No short title on file)YESYESDecision of Chair Sustained (53-47)
2025-06-28H.R. 1 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49)
2025-06-27S.J. Res. 59 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 59NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2025-06-26Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-06-25End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-06-25Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (56-40)
2025-06-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-06-24Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (61-35)
2025-06-23End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (58-33)
2025-06-18Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-18Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-06-18End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-46)
2025-06-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (68-30)
2025-06-17Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-06-17Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (57-40)
2025-06-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-06-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (46-39)
2025-06-16End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (44-33)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (67-27, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (67-30)
2025-06-12Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Amdt. No. 2307)YESYESMotion Agreed to (64-33, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Failed (45-52)
2025-06-12Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-44)
2025-06-11S.J. Res. 54 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 54NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (39-56)
2025-06-11S.J. Res. 53 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 53NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (39-56)
2025-06-11S. 1582 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (68-30, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-11End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-43)
2025-06-10End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-44)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-44)
2025-06-10End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-41)
2025-06-09End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-06-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-41)
2025-06-05End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2025-06-05Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-05End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-43)
2025-06-05Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-04Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (57-38)
2025-06-04Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (48-46)
2025-06-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 10 / 16Next →