I’ve been to Trump’s State of the Unions before and really don’t need to go again.
He uses his speeches to pillory his political enemies and spread lies – not to mention they're long and boring.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes75%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 180 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
You won’t find cleaner waters than the Boundary Waters. Think endless streams of water filled with bass, walleye, trout and northern pike – total wilderness, only accessible by canoe.
Why would we let a Chilean mining company pollute these public lands, take our minerals and ship them off to China?
The ICE surge in Minnesota isn’t over — it just moved outside of the Metro.
ICE agents are still terrorizing innocent people in the suburbs. They’re targeting bus stops and hospitals and parks and being more deceptive than ever.
This isn’t over until ICE is out of the ENTIRE state.
Reposted byTina Smith
"What we need to do, I think right now, is to stand firm on this principle because if we don't, they're just gonna do it again someplace else."
Senator Tina Smith explains to Tim Miller why she will vote against every penny of funding for ICE and border protection.
American producers being hurt by trade cheats deserve serious remedies. Instead, the President wasted nearly a year on his futile effort to impose blanket tariffs, rather than policies that would withstand legal scrutiny.
Trump abused his power to make a complete mess of our trade systems, and regular people and small businesses paid the price. Money collected from these illegal tariffs should go back into their pockets.
How many children are being held in unsafe conditions like this?
This is where Minnesota toddlers are still being held. Even with parents who did nothing wrong.
Reposted byTina Smith
Our public lands are our shared inheritance, and that includes the Boundary Waters.
Stand with Teddy Roosevelt’s family – speak out to protect what belongs to all of us.
Reason #1000000 why we can’t trust a word they say – this is a cover up in plain sight.
Ramadan Mubarak, Minnesota! May this holy month be filled with reflection and blessings.
Our state has come together to support each other in this dark and challenging moment, and may you feel that love and support from your neighbors this holy month.
Reposted byTina Smith
In a rare letter to Republican senators, four descendants of Teddy Roosevelt oppose mining near Minnesota’s Boundary Waters.
Happy Lunar New Year, Minnesota! Wishing you all a year of good health and fortune during the Year of the Horse.
Minnesotans are going to be reeling from this for a long time. Yes, it seems they’re in retreat. But that doesn’t fix the damage they’ve brought upon us.
When this is all over, we’re going to be left figuring out how to put our state back together again.
Reposted byTina Smith
AG Keith Ellison: "The surge is contributing to violent crime. Two of the three homicides committed in Minneapolis in 2026 have come at the hands of federal immigration agents."
ICE out of Minnesota was our first goal, not the last.
Congress still needs to deliver justice and accountability for Alex, Renee and every Minnesotan who has spent the better part of 2026 in paralyzing fear.
We showed them exactly how to stand up to bullies with strength, dignity, and peace.
But this drawdown won’t make torn apart families whole again. It won’t replenish the tens of millions of dollars small businesses lost. It won’t de-traumatize our kids. It won’t bring back Alex or Renee.
They made the grave mistake of invading the Northland in the dead of winter.
They’re retreating because Minnesotans are stronger than they’ll ever be – driven by an unshakeable love for our neighbors.
Still true now and will continue to be true in the future.
Reposted byTina Smith
SWALWELL: Will you apologize to the family of Renee Good for being called a domestic terrorist by the president and his leadership?
LYONS: No sir
SWALWELL: Is she a domestic terrorist?
LYONS: I'm not going to comment on an active investigation
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History772 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
772 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 76 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-11-19 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-32) |
| 2025-11-18 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (65-32) |
| 2025-11-10 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (60-40) |
| 2025-11-10 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-40, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-11-10 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (60-40) |
| 2025-11-10 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-40, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-11-10 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (76-24) |
| 2025-11-10 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (47-53) |
| 2025-11-10 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (47-53) |
| 2025-11-10 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (60-40) |
| 2025-11-09 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (60-40, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-11-07 | S. 3012 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-43, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-11-06 | S.J. Res. 90 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 90 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-11-05 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-43) |
| 2025-11-05 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-11-05 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-11-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-11-04 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-44, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-11-03 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-10-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-10-30 | S.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 88 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-47) |
| 2025-10-30 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 80 | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-45) |
| 2025-10-29 | S.J. Res. 77 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 77 | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Joint Resolution Passed (50-46) |
| 2025-10-29 | S.J. Res. 69 (119th) | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Motion to Proceed Rejected (25-72) |
| 2025-10-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-10-29 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-10-28 | S.J. Res. 81 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 81 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-48) |
| 2025-10-28 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-10-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-47) |
| 2025-10-28 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-10-28 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-10-27 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (58-40) |
| 2025-10-27 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-10-23 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-10-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-45) |
| 2025-10-23 | S. 3012 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-10-22 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-10-22 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-10-22 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-39) |
| 2025-10-22 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-10-21 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-10-21 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-10-21 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-10-21 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-32) |
| 2025-10-20 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-43, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-10-16 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-44, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-10-16 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-34) |
| 2025-10-16 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.