Jack Reed headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Rhode Island
Born
1949
Age 77
Phone
(202) 224-4642
Office
728 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Rhode Island

Jack Reed

John Francis Reed is an American lawyer and politician serving as the senior United States senator from Rhode Island, a seat he was first elected to in 1996. A member of the Democratic Party, he was the U.S. representative for Rhode Island's 2nd congressional district from 1991 to 1997. Reed graduated from the United States Military Academy and Harvard University, serving in the U.S. Army as an active officer from 1971 to 1979. He is the dean of Rhode Island's congressional delegation since 1999 upon the death of John Chafee.

Voting Record — 840
Yes34%
No65%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jack Reed headshot
Jack Reed
U.S. SenatorDemocratRhode Island
SoupScore
Jack's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 171 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

RIC & CCRI are doing great things to prepare RIers for good-paying careers in high-demand fields like cybersecurity. New cyber apprenticeship program launched today will help connect more students with the skills & hands-on experience they need to succeed & help grow our economy.
U.S. media works hard to inform Americans, uphold the 1st Amendment, & respect sensitive details & nat’l security. Pres. Trump said he wants U.S. journalists prosecuted for reporting details on the downed U.S. plane, even though Israeli media apparently broke the news.
Since the East Bay Bike Path bridges went out of service in 2019, bike path lovers & neighbors wanted to bring them back better than ever. Working w/ @whitehouse.senate.gov, we delivered $14M in fed investments to help make it happen. Today we cut the ribbon on this great project!
Dems will continue pushing for commonsense reforms to rein in out-of-control ICE & Border Patrol agents. Accountability must come for unjustified violence & unconstitutional actions. GOP should stop trying to ignore Americans’ demand for needed reform & oversight.
The unanimous agreement re-passed today is virtually same deal that was proposed a month ago, but Pres. Trump delayed it while trying to leverage DHS shutdown to punish federal workers & win unrelated concessions. He failed, wasted time & money & inflicted damage on avg Americans.
Today the GOP-controlled U.S. Senate once again repassed the exact same DHS funding bill. Pres. Trump endorsed it. Now House Republicans are last remaining obstruction. They should prioritize homeland security over petty intra-party squabble & reopen DHS immediately.
Good housing news for RI!   🏡New $28M fed investments will help strengthen RI’s affordable housing safety net & upgrade public housing.   🏗️RI Federal Court ruled Trump Admin’s attempt to politicize HUD housing grants was unlawful, helping housing and service providers & removing red tape.
Proud day for the men & women of NASA as the Artemis II mission prepares for liftoff. Kudos to the terrific RI businesses, universities, & researchers who’ve contributed to the #Artemis missions!
150 Richmond is home to RI’s state-of-the-art new state health lab & the Ocean State's first life science incubator which is helping drive economic growth & push biomedical advancements forward. Great things happening in RI for public health & our economy.
As Pres. Trump’s policies raise prices, weaken job market, & shrink federal food aid, it increases food insecurity. As more Americans struggle with cost of living, Congress must keep investing in effective hunger relief programs like SNAP.
New USDA data show 2.5 million fewer people participated in SNAP in December compared to July, when the Republican megabill (H.R. 1) enacted the deepest SNAP cuts in history. This is only the beginning — even more people will lose SNAP as the full brunt of these cuts take effect.
Text of graphic: Did you know? The Republican megabill enacted the deepest SNAP cuts in history in July 2025. By December, 2.5 million fewer people were receiving SNAP benefits.
Any time House Republicans make phony claim that Dems are uncommitted to strong homeland security, remind them: The DHS funding bill they are insulting was UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED BY REPUBLICAN-CONTROLLED SENATE. House Republicans are fooling no one but themselves.
By blocking the bipartisan DHS bill that unanimously passed U.S. Senate, the House GOP is needlessly forcing homeland security personnel to go unpaid and hindering critical work of agencies such as FEMA and CISA (which Trump previously tried to eliminate and undermine).
It's not easy to get 100 U.S. Senators in full agreement. But every Senator from every state agreed to put the safety & security of the American people first & UNANIMOUSLY passed a bipartisan DHS bill to help secure the homeland. Now, House GOP is refusing to vote.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
840 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 17 / 17