Jacky Rosen headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Nevada
Born
August 2, 1957
Age 68
Phone
(202) 224-6244
Office
713 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Nevada

Jacky Rosen

Jacklyn Sheryl Rosen is an American politician serving as the junior United States senator from Nevada since 2019. A member of the Democratic Party, she was the U.S. representative for Nevada's 3rd congressional district from 2017 to 2019.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 776
Yes36%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align89%
Cross-party11%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jacky Rosen headshot
Jacky Rosen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNevada
SoupScore
Jacky's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 59 sponsored · 213 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Washington Republicans kicked families off SNAP and made massive health care cuts, stretching Americans’ budgets to the limit. If that wasn’t bad enough, Nevadans are now paying the highest gas prices in the past four years. Hardworking families need relief.
Pam Bondi did everything she could to prevent the Epstein files from being made public while using the Department of Justice to go after Donald Trump’s political opponents. She did nothing to stand for the rule of law — instead shielding Trump from accountability. She won't be missed.
Estoy feliz de que mi proyecto de ley para mejorar los pronósticos meteorológicos haya pasado el comité, y seguiré trabajando para que este proyecto se convierta en ley para ayudar a nuestros agricultores.
Mientras que los eventos extremos climáticos se vuelven más comunes y menos predecibles, es necesario que invirtamos en el mejoramiento de los pronósticos meteorológicos, para que nuestras comunidades locales puedan prepararse mejor.
I’m introducing bipartisan legislation with @susielee.house.gov that will help fill gaps in our cybersecurity workforce and open the door to more good-paying jobs for Nevadans, regardless of whether or not they have a college degree.
One year ago, Donald Trump declared sweeping tariffs on his so-called “Liberation Day,” driving up costs for hardworking families and small businesses. When the Supreme Court found these tariffs illegal, he doubled down and imposed more.🧵
From my family to yours, I’m wishing everyone a meaningful and healthy Passover. Passover is a time to come together to remember the challenges we’ve overcome and celebrate hope with loved ones. Chag Pesach Sameach!
I’m proud my bill to rectify this injustice has advanced out of committee, and I will continue fighting until all of our veterans can access the benefits they deserve for their selfless service to this country.
Many veterans who served at the Nevada Test and Training Range were exposed to toxic radiation during their service and suffer from health challenges because of it – but they can’t access the same benefits as their Dept. of Energy civilian counterparts.
Gas prices are the highest they’ve been in four years – and Nevada is one of the states being hit the hardest. All while groceries and health care continue to get more expensive. Do you feel like you are better off?
The Constitution is clear: children born in the United States are citizens. It is critical that the Supreme Court upholds the Constitution and puts an end to Donald Trump’s attempt to revoke citizenship from children born in the United States.
Soaring gas prices are making Americans skip meals, miss prescriptions, and pay more for their grocery bills. Trump hasn’t done anything to address affordability, and the American people are paying the price.
If Trump restarts explosive nuclear testing in Nevada, the dangerous effects will be felt far beyond our state.    I’ll fight against any and all efforts by this Administration to resume this unnecessary and reckless testing.
“Thank a Democrat?” Have Senate Republicans forgotten about the BIPARTISAN bill we passed to pay our TSA workers, Coast Guard, and FEMA – only for House Republicans to refuse to bring it up for a vote? 🧵
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
776 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 172)YESYESMotion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 276)YESYESMotion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Wyden Amdt. No. 1156)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776)YESYESMotion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (51-49)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494)YESYESMotion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-49)
2025-02-20End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-19Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-02-18S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-02-18Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-02-18Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45)
2025-02-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2025-02-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-02-13Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (72-28)
2025-02-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-10End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 15 / 16Next →