Charles E. Schumer headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New York
Born
November 23, 1950
Age 75
Phone
(202) 224-6542
Office
322 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New York

Charles E. Schumer

Voting Record — 890
Yes29%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Charles E. Schumer headshot
Charles E. Schumer
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew York
SoupScore
Charles E.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 32 sponsored · 176 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

On Memorial Day and every day, we remember our brave servicemembers who made the ultimate sacrifice while serving our country. We honor their families who carry their memory every day. We'll never stop honoring our fallen heroes. We will never stop fighting to do right by our Gold Star families. 🇺🇸
The Republicans' 'Big Beautiful Bill' is trying to force through the LARGEST cut to Medicaid in American history. The LARGEST cut to Medicaid in American history. That’s not beautiful. That’s ugly. And it will rip health care away from millions.
The National Labor Relations Board stands up for American workers. That’s why the Trump administration is trying so hard to fight them. It’s not over, and we’ll keep fighting for Commissioner Wilcox to serve her full term as confirmed by the Senate.
A headline from NPR reads: “Supreme Court allows Trump to fire members of independent agency boards — for now”
BREAKING: We're introducing a bill to stop Trump and Bondi from weaponizing US Marshals. It'll move the Marshals from the Executive to the Judiciary Branch. It'll stop Trump and Bondi from interfering as they enforce court orders or weaponizing them to intimidate citizens and government employees.
Republicans rammed their so-called 'Big, Beautiful Bill’ through the House There's nothing beautiful about: The largest cuts to Medicaid Hospitals and health centers shutting down Raising taxes on clean energy and raising energy prices Senate Democrats will oppose this morally bankrupt bill
Defunding Planned Parenthood wasn’t enough for Republicans The radicals got their pitchforks and added a provision to effectively ban every insurance premium on every ACA exchange for covering abortion Democrats will fight this awful bill
Yaron Lischinsky Sarah Milgrim A beautiful young couple, about to be engaged, just starting their lives, gunned down seemingly because they were Jewish This was cold-blooded murder of two Jewish staffers from the Israeli embassy Such a blatant, targeted act of antisemitism should outrage everyone
With the news that Trump formally accepted the Qatari jet: I took to the Senate floor to pass my bill to block DoD from spending a single penny on a foreign Air Force One It’s a bribe It’s a national security threat But Republicans stood with Trump and blocked my bill THAT’S NOT AMERICA FIRST
The Republican tax bill would hurt the most vulnerable Americans while benefitting the billionaires. American families will lose healthcare American families will lose food benefits American families will lose jobs American families will lose money
A headline from USA Today reads: "New analysis shows GOP tax bill would decrease resources for poorest Americans"
120 days into Trump’s presidency: Trump’s trade war is raising prices The GOP is fighting to take away Medicaid Distrust in Trump’s leadership is rising on the world stage
While Republicans are giving tax cuts to billionaires, Trump is hurting American farmers and taking food out of the mouths of hungry kids around the world Letting kids go hungry isn’t just unfair, it’s immoral. Hurting farmers isn’t just incompetent, it’s bad for America.
A headline from Politico reads: "USDA spiking global food aid grants"
Republicans' 'Big Beautiful Bill' is forcing billions in cuts to MEDICARE—which will hurt seniors. On top of the LARGEST cut to Medicaid in American history. It's shameful.
A headline from The Washington Post reads: "Trump and GOP’s tax bill would force cuts to Medicare, CBO says"
NEWS: The GOP plan to gut Medicaid could kick 1.5 MILLION New Yorkers off health insurance and rip $13.5 BILLION from local New York hospitals and health care every year. That's what New York Republicans are preparing to steal from New Yorkers to fund their billionaire tax cuts.
Companies are raising prices because of Trump’s tariff tax and it’s hurting families. And what does Trump say about it? “Eat the tariffs.” Maybe it’s hard for Trump to hear everyone's concerns from inside his luxury Qatari jet.
This is disgusting The Trump admin is disrespecting the Capitol Police by awarding $5 MILLION to the family of Ashley Babbitt AN INSURRECTIONIST This sends a sickening message to police and first responders When it matters most, Trump will turn his back on you
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
890 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (66-28)
2025-02-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-43)
2025-02-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Accept House changesNONOConcurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-21Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233)YESYESMotion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (24-76)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 172)YESYESMotion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 276)YESYESMotion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Wyden Amdt. No. 1156)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776)YESYESMotion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (51-49)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494)YESYESMotion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-49)
2025-02-20End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-19Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-02-18S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-02-18Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-02-18Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45)
2025-02-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2025-02-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-02-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (72-28)
2025-02-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-10End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 17 / 18Next →