ICYMI: I've fought to ensure New Hampshire's drinking water is clean, safe and PFAS-free.
I was proud to see critical funding that I secured in the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law released last week to help communities and private well owners address PFAS contamination.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire
Jeanne Shaheen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 840
Yes43%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 88 sponsored · 299 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
With average ACA premiums spiking and deductibles rising, it’s no surprise health care affordability remains a top concern across the country.
By capping insulin at $35 a month, my INSULIN Act would lower costs for Americans living with diabetes.
www.kff.org/affordable-c...
From the war in Iran to historic funding cuts, food banks are being squeezed at every turn.
These organizations do critical work. Yet rather than support them, this Administration cut taxes for our nation's wealthiest.
That is unconscionable.
www.nytimes.com/2026/05/20/u...
With rising housing costs a top concern in our state, I'm doing everything I can to help people afford a home.
Manufactured homes are a critical source of affordable housing in NH, and I'm working to protect these residents from predatory rent hikes.
www.wmur.com/article/jean...
Health care costs are spiking, especially since Republicans allowed the ACA enhanced premium tax credits I championed to expire.
My INSULIN Act would help ease this burden—capping monthly insulin costs at $35 to lower costs for millions with diabetes.
www.washingtonpost.com/health/2026/...
Gerrymandering is a problem. It allows our representatives to ignore the other side. It fosters polarization, not compromise that delivers for Americans.
Spiking gas prices due to the war in Iran are stretching my constituents thin and threatening funding for critical infrastructure projects throughout the Granite State.
President Trump has no plan for his war in Iran, and it's Americans who are paying the price.
TRIO Upward Bound programs are life-changing for young people in New Hampshire, preparing them for academic success. I’m relieved that the Department of Education released funding for these programs, but it never should have been withheld in the first place.
The war in Ukraine has real implications for U.S. national security.
If Russia wins that war, Vladimir Putin will feel he has the green light to attack a NATO Ally, and President Xi will feel emboldened to move on Taiwan.
Stars & Stripes has provided invaluable coverage of our nation’s military for over 150 years.
The editorial independence of Stars & Stripes is non-negotiable, no matter what Secretary Hegseth may think.
www.semafor.com/article/05/2...
May is Military Appreciation Month, where we take a moment to commemorate those who serve in our armed forces and our nation's veterans.
We owe them an unpayable debt.
Four years ago in Uvalde, 21 lives—19 children and 2 teachers—were tragically taken from us in a horrific mass shooting at Robb Elementary School.
The time has come for Congress to take action on commonsense reforms to prevent future tragedies.
No family should have to wonder whether the water they're drinking has been contaminated with toxic lead.
Glad to see over $27 million that I secured in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law heading to New Hampshire to remove lead pipes and upgrade aging water systems.
With health care costs surging and the President admitting "he doesn’t think about" your finances, families are right to be anxious. I’m working to ease this burden.
By capping insulin at $35 a month, my INSULIN Act would lower costs for millions of families.
www.kff.org/public-opini...
Last week, the Supreme Court again ruled to maintain access to mifepristone, but we’re not out of the woods yet. Republican lawmakers are intent on restricting access to reproductive health care.
We must stay vigilant and continue to speak up for our rights.
As costs spike, the President is using your tax dollars to create a $1.8 billion slush fund for his political allies.
Yet again, President Trump is making it clear: his priority is enriching himself and his political allies, not serving the American people.
www.cnn.com/2026/05/20/p...
Putin and Xi and other dictators are playing Donald Trump. They understand that if they flatter him, if they make him think he's important, that they're going to be able to get something from him.
More Republicans are speaking out against the President's war. They're hearing from their constituents about a war that hasn't accomplished any of the goals that President Trump set out and is driving up costs at the gas pump and grocery store.
With prices up across the board due to the President's war in Iran, my INSULIN Act would provide real relief to families struggling with the increased health care costs they've seen since the expiration of the ACA enhanced premium tax credits.
No one should have to choose between the cost of lifesaving insulin and putting food on the table.
We need to provide some help amid soaring health care costs, and by capping monthly insulin costs at $35, my INSULIN Act would do just that.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History840 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
840 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17