We’re in the midst of a cost of living crisis, and President Trump's tariffs are making products that families rely on even more expensive.
The President said he was going to lower prices for Americans, but all we've seen are higher and higher costs from his reckless trade war.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire
Jeanne Shaheen
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes42%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 97 sponsored · 327 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I met with some health care advocates, providers and Granite Staters who use the ACA Marketplace for health insurance. They told me it will be devastating for New Hampshire if the ACA enhanced premium tax credits expire. They're counting on us to take action before it's too late.
I hope that the President is going to provide those long-range weapons that President Zelensky is requesting.
But the Senate also needs to act.
There are a lot of falsehoods circulating around who benefits from ACA enhanced premium tax credits. So let’s clear it up in simple terms: two truths and a lie ⬇️
Working Americans are already living paycheck to paycheck—they can't afford to spend an extra $2,000 per month on health care premiums.
It's time for Republicans in Congress and the White House to join us to prevent this disaster for family budgets.
www.nbcnews.com/health/healt...
Who benefits from ACA enhanced premium tax credits? Tens of millions of Americans from coast to coast.
If Congress doesn’t act soon, health care costs are going to surge for the folks who can least afford it.
Republican Insurance Commissioner Jon Godfread is right to sound the alarm: Congress only has a matter of days to extend ACA enhanced premium tax credits by November 1 before health care costs are permanently set higher.
We must work across the aisle to get this done before then.
Millions of moms just like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene are worried about how their families are going to afford health care if the ACA enhanced premium tax credits expire.
We can take action now to extend these credits. Let's work together to get this done and prevent costs from soaring.
Reposted byU.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen
1.4 million Georgians could see their premiums skyrocket next year if ACA tax credits expire.
Republicans are claiming that the ACA tax credits go to the wealthy—but that's just not accurate.
The average salary of a person who benefits from the Affordable Care Act enhanced premium tax credits is $32,000 a year.
Bill Hemmer: Why play stick 'em up now?
Sen. Shaheen: The reason we need to address it [ACA tax credits] now is because insurance companies are setting their rates now.
Hemmer: But you’ve got 3 months to negotiate.
Shaheen: No no, no...They're getting their rate increases now.
Bill Hemmer: Why play stick 'em up now?
Sen. Shaheen: The reason we need to address it [ACA tax credits] now is because insurance companies are setting their rates now.
Hemmer: But you’ve got 3 months to negotiate.
Shaheen: No no, no...They're getting their rate increases now.
Jeff is a cancer survivor whose clean bill of health wouldn't have been possible without affordable health care through the ACA.
If these tax credits expire, his premium will skyrocket.
Jeff’s health care isn’t negotiable. Congress needs to extend these tax credits now.
With less than one month until open enrollment, time is of the essence.
Congress must act now to extend the expiring health insurance tax credits, or else everyday Americans will be forced to foot the bill for skyrocketing health care costs.
If my Republican colleagues fail to work with us, 267,000 veterans will lose their health care, according to a new report from the Urban Institute.
These are Americans who put their lives on the line for our nation, who will be priced out of health care if Congress doesn’t act.
If ACA premium tax cuts are allowed to expire, Granite Staters like Michelle will be priced out of health care coverage.
Health care isn't optional. We need to extend these tax credits for the tens of millions of Americans who rely on them to afford health insurance.
Let’s work together, reopen the government and prevent suffocating premium hikes for everyday families and small businesses.
newhampshirebulletin.com/2025/09/25/h...
If the ACA enhanced premium tax credits expire, health care costs will skyrocket:
📈A single person in their 40s earning $31K annually in NH could see their annual premiums increase $1,344.
📈A couple in their 60s earning $90K annually could see their premiums increase $14,712.
This administration's attack on federal workers began on day one.
Claiming that the government shutdown is forcing them to fire federal workers is totally inaccurate.
There is real urgency to addressing the cost of health insurance and extending the ACA tax credits to prevent millions from losing their coverage. Insurance companies are setting their rates NOW, and the marketplace opens on November 1.
We can't afford to wait.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-41) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (81-15) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (21-75) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (15-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (14-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (42-53) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (44-51) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-41) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-41) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-38) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 34 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (24-73) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 41 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (27-70) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-44) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.