It's the first day of Military Family Appreciation Month—a time when we honor the sacrifices military families make every day to support their loved ones serving at home and abroad. It's also up to us to ensure that military families have the support they need and deserve.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire
Jeanne Shaheen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 782
Yes41%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 283 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Americans elected Donald Trump in part because he vowed to lower the price of ‘everything’ – yet in the first quarter of Trump’s presidency, our GDP shrank, prices jumped and economists across the political spectrum are saying a recession is likely this year.
apnews.com/article/econ...
As President Trump eyes opportunities to expand offshore drilling, I joined New England’s bipartisan delegation in introducing legislation to safeguard our coast from disastrous oil spills that cause economic and environmental devastation for our communities.
thepulseofnh.com/hassan-shahe...
On the campaign trail, Trump promised to ‘immediately’ bring prices down, starting on day one. One hundred days in, it is painfully obvious that President Trump has done the exact opposite. My full statement below⬇️
www.shaheen.senate.gov/shaheen-trum...
And of course, then Trump administration senior advisor Ivanka Trump in 2019:
Add to the list, a Trump-appointed Pentagon spokesman in 2020:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem introduced the Women, Peace and Security Act in 2017 while serving in the House:
Here’s National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, then a U.S. Representative and Co-Chair of the WPS Caucus that he founded, highlighting WPS last year:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xy2R...
Just this month, Secretary of State Marco Rubio—an original cosponsor of the legislation when he served in the Senate—praised WPS:
The Women, Peace and Security program that Secretary Hegseth called “woke” and "weak” was passed by a Republican-led Congress and then signed into law by Trump in 2017.
But don’t take it from me, Trump administration officials have been plenty vocal in their support for WPS:
Hegseth’s unlawful move to end the bipartisan Women, Peace and Security law weakens America’s global standing.
It’s startling that just because the word ‘women’ is in the title, this evidence-based security program has been reduced to a DEI program.
Despite overwhelmingly positive feedback from taxpayers, this administration plans to dismantle the Direct File program. I'm urging the Treasury Secretary and Acting IRS Commissioner to protect and expand this tool that makes tax filing easier and free for millions of Americans.
For Granite Staters like John, Medicaid has allowed them to access the physical and mental health care they need to improve their lives.
Republican cuts to Medicaid would put the vital programs and services that these folks rely on at risk.
www.conwaydailysun.com/berlin_sun/n...
President Trump's reckless trade war isn’t just raising costs for families — it is hurting our defense supply chains and harming our military readiness.
Just this week, I visited a key defense manufacturer in NH that is already facing longer wait times and higher prices.
Let's be honest: Pete Hegseth was never qualified to lead the U.S. Department of Defense.
The chaos the Secretary created at the Pentagon puts our service members and military readiness at risk.
He's not the leader we need at this time.
Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov does a great job at talking a lot and saying nothing.
Good to join Margaret Brennan on @facethenation.bsky.social to discuss how it's imperative for the U.S. to sustain pressure on Russia to secure a just and lasting peace for Ukraine.
Federally funded Head Start is vital to bringing affordable child care within reach for working families.
Trump's mass firings of staff at Head Start and plans to completely eliminate the program are unacceptable. I joined my colleagues in demanding an end to this madness.
NH Ball Bearings supports local jobs, contributes to our national defense and strengthens U.S. military readiness. I appreciated hearing from them this week about the higher costs and uncertainty they’re facing due to the Trump administration’s reckless trade war.
The YMCA of Greater Nashua’s Merrimack Branch is a terrific resource for Granite State families. It was great to visit today and discuss more ways to address New Hampshire's child care affordability crisis and provider shortage.
I led a discussion at NAMI in Concord to underscore the consequences of Trump’s reckless cuts to life-saving health services.
I won't stand for federal funding cuts that make it harder for folks struggling with mental illness and substance use disorder to access services.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History782 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
782 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Motion (Schumer Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Decision of the Chair H.R. 1 | NO | NO | ✓ | Decision of Chair Sustained (53-47) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Decision of the Chair S.Amdt. 2360 to H.R. 1 (No short title on file) | NO | NO | ✓ | Decision of Chair Sustained (53-47) |
| 2025-06-28 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-06-27 | S.J. Res. 59 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 59 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-06-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-25 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-06-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (56-40) |
| 2025-06-24 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (61-35) |
| 2025-06-23 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (58-33) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-46) |
| 2025-06-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (68-30) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (57-40) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-39) |
| 2025-06-16 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-33) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-27, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (67-30) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Amdt. No. 2307) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Agreed to (64-33, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (45-52) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 54 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 54 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 53 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 53 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (68-30, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-41) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-41) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (57-38) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (72-26) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-36) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-37) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.