Across the country, hardworking Americans have to pay thousands of dollars a year to afford their life-saving insulin medication.
With health care costs rising across the board, we must keep fighting to cap insulin at $35 a month and deliver real relief to millions of families.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire
Jeanne Shaheen
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 885
Yes42%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 96 sponsored · 325 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Dairy farmers are the backbone of New Hampshire’s agricultural sector.
As we near the end of National Dairy Month, I remain committed to this essential industry that works to supply all Granite Staters with access to fresh, locally produced milk products.
Congress just passed one of the most important housing bills in decades that will lower costs for Granite Staters and expand housing supply across the country.
Now, all that’s left is for the President to sign it—which he’s refused to do for nearly a week.
Democrats agree. Republicans agree.
Americans agree.
Insulin is too expensive, and we must cap the cost of this lifesaving medication.
My INSULIN Act would do just that.
57 years ago, at the Stonewall Inn, a movement began that paved the way for rights, equality and justice for LGBTQ+ individuals in our nation.
Today, we remember the bravery of those at Stonewall and honor the courage of all those who continue to stand up for LGBTQ+ rights.
The cost of everything is up, and energy prices are no exception. My bipartisan legislation would ensure federal funding from 2 critical programs is made available without delay so that communities and families can benefit from energy efficiency upgrades that lower utility bills.
President Trump claimed that his reckless tariffs would revitalize our manufacturing sector.
In reality, they cost American manufacturers thousands of jobs and raised costs across the board.
www.foxnews.com/politics/tru...
Parents should never have to worry about affording the insulin their child needs to survive.
By capping insulin at $35 a month, my INSULIN Act would do just that—and we have the bipartisan support needed to get it passed.
Title IX was passed to ensure schools are safer, equitable and more inclusive for all students.
54 years after the signing of this law, we must continue the fight to ensure all students are welcome in the classroom.
Even as Americans receive refunds from the Trump Administration's illegal tariffs, President Trump is already plotting a new round of damaging policies.
The President should be providing financial relief to Americans, not implementing more tariffs.
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
The Supreme Court’s outrageous Dobbs decision stripped women of our hard-earned reproductive freedoms and set back decades of progress.
4 years later, our fundamental rights are still under attack. We must fight to restore access to the full range of reproductive health care.
More than half of Americans worry about being able to afford the medications they need.
In the richest country in the world, this is a travesty.
By capping insulin at $35 a month, my INSULIN Act would directly lower costs for millions of Americans.
www.semafor.com/article/06/1...
We've made great strides in the fight against substance use disorder, but our work isn't done.
I was proud to secure $900,000 in federal funds for Dartmouth Health to ensure expecting mothers battling substance use disorder have the resources they need.
www.concordmonitor.com/2026/06/18/p...
Like much of the country, we’re facing a shortage of child care providers, and it's especially dire in the most rural areas of our state.
I'll keep fighting to expand access to child care across New Hampshire for the families who depend on it everyday.
newhampshirebulletin.com/2026/06/15/u...
ICYMI: Over 8 million Americans manage their diabetes with insulin each and every day.
As health care costs continue to rise, I’m working hard to ensure that every American can afford the life saving insulin they need.
www.foxnews.com/opinion/sen-...
Happy Father’s Day, New Hampshire!
To all of the grandfathers, dads and father figures across the country, thank you for all that you do.
Juneteenth is one of the most consequential days in our nation’s history.
I was honored to attend the Black Heritage Trail of NH’s Juneteenth Celebration to commemorate those who fought against the horror of slavery and recommit ourselves to the continual fight to foster a more equal nation.
On this day 43 years ago, Dr. Sally Ride inspired millions when she became the first American woman to go to space.
Her legacy lives on four decades later as young women follow in her footsteps to pursue careers in STEM and achieve new breakthroughs in the field.
The President and congressional Republicans refused to extend the ACA enhanced premium tax credits, raising health care costs for millions.
Now, as health care affordability remains a top concern, they have a new “plan”: Take out a loan and go into debt.
www.nytimes.com/2026/06/11/b...
An overwhelming majority of Americans agree: We must cap the cost of insulin at $35 a month.
With 26 bipartisan cosponsors and counting, we have the support needed to pass my INSULIN Act in the Senate and lower health care costs for millions.
Let’s get this done.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History885 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
885 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-17 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41) |
| 2026-06-16 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (87-8) |
| 2026-06-16 | S.J. Res. 172 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 172 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-48) |
| 2026-06-16 | S.J. Res. 190 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-48) |
| 2026-06-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-43) |
| 2026-06-11 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-43) |
| 2026-06-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2026-06-10 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2026-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (50-44) |
| 2026-06-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2026-06-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2026-06-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Budgetary Discipline Re: Lee Amdt. No. 5804) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (50-49, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Motion (Wyden Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-51) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 1318 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (52-47) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schiff Amdt. No. 5740) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 5632) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (53-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (45-53) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Cassidy Amdt. No. 5812) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Coons Amdt. No. 5457) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Durbin Amdt. No. 5806) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Booker Amdt. No. 5803) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 5485) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Sanders Amdt. No. 5451) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (45-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | S. 2 (119th) | Motion (Warnock Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-52) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Kim Amdt. No. 5545) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 5501) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (51-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Graham Amdt. No. 5779) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 5556) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hassan Amdt. No. 5535) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | S. 2 (119th) | Motion (Ossoff Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-50) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 5514) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 5512) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (53-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Tillis Amdt. No. 5452) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (15-84) |
| 2026-06-04 | S. 2 (119th) | Motion (Schumer motion to commit S.2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-06-03 | S. 2 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2026-06-03 | S.J. Res. 188 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-53) |
| 2026-06-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2026-06-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2026-06-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2026-06-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-05-20 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-47) |
| 2026-05-19 | S.J. Res. 185 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 185 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2026-05-19 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2026-05-19 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (52-38) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.