
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Hawaii
Brian Schatz
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes28%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align96%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Brian Schatz
U.S. SenatorDemocratHawaii
SoupScore
Brian's ATmosphere Activity
5 recent posts · 52 sponsored · 188 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I mean I don’t know I just got here!
Your posts are good!
Reposted byBrian Schatz
Btw earlier this year while researching the US government’s horrific and immoral Tuskegee Syphilis “Study”, I learned that Sen. Schatz’s late father Irwin was one of the first whistleblowers to call it out. I will say his name and remind people of this as long as I can. May his memory be a blessing.
Thanks Jake. He remains my hero.
Btw earlier this year while researching the US government’s horrific and immoral Tuskegee Syphilis “Study”, I learned that Sen. Schatz’s late father Irwin was one of the first whistleblowers to call it out. I will say his name and remind people of this as long as I can. May his memory be a blessing.
I think it’s possible that this thing could work. If anyone can recommend some follows I would appreciate that.
← Newer postsPosts page 32
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History851 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
851 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 18 / 18