Peter Welch headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Vermont
Born
May 2, 1947
Age 79
Phone
(202) 224-4242
Office
115 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Vermont

Peter Welch

Peter Francis Welch is an American lawyer and politician serving since 2023 as the junior United States senator from Vermont. A member of the Democratic Party, he was the U.S. representative for Vermont's at-large congressional district from 2007 to 2023. He has been a major figure in Vermont politics for over four decades and is only the second Democrat to represent Vermont in the Senate, after his predecessor, Patrick Leahy.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 788
Yes29%
No65%
Present0%
Not Voting6%
Party align95%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Peter Welch headshot
Peter Welch
U.S. SenatorDemocratVermont
SoupScore
Peter's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 69 sponsored · 393 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

As a Fox News host, Jeanine Pirro promoted conspiracies surrounding the 2020 election, even after the network confirmed her statements had been debunked. If she can do that on-air, imagine what she can in our judicial system. I will vote against her nomination for U.S. Attorney.
On one hand, the U.S. could continue to support global health programs that save lives and reduce the spread of disease to America. But on the other hand, President Trump would rather give tax cuts to billionaires, so the Senate is about to vote to gut these lifesaving programs.
So President Trump thinks supporting shows like Sesame Street and Mr. Rogers is a bad use of funding but giving massive tax breaks to billionaires is a good idea? Got it.
• South Dakota – $3,038,524 • Tennessee – $7,365,199 • Texas – $17,719,507 • Utah – $7,103,835 • Vermont – $2,043,510 • Virginia – $99,465,449 • Washington – $10,106,644 • West Virginia – $1,790,242 • Wisconsin – $8,498,812 • Wyoming – $1,870,865 Thats more than $1 BILLION from around the country.
• New Jersey – $2,282,024 • New Mexico – $5,841,697 • New York – $42,556,210 • North Carolina – $8,236,216 • North Dakota – $2,564,579 • Ohio – $13,341,101 • Oklahoma – $3,485,600 • Oregon – $7,468,534 • Pennsylvania – $14,492,945 • Rhode Island – $1,082,244 • South Carolina – $3,488,714
• Maine – $2,895,498 • Maryland – $6,357,641 • Massachusetts – $22,549,333 • Michigan – $11,818,761 • Minnesota – $17,228,752 • Mississippi – $2,824,520 • Missouri – $8,677,805 • Montana – $2,837,807 • Nebraska – $6,297,290 • Nevada – $3,881,471 • New Hampshire – $1,795,240
• District of Columbia – $18,275,757 • Florida – $24,944,99 • Georgia – $6,558,857 • Hawaii – $4,292,969 • Idaho – $3,341,916 • Illinois – $12,818,816 • Indiana – $9,388,508 • Iowa – $4,723,772 • Kansas – $3,989,434 • Kentucky – $6,627,021 • Louisiana – $6,530,752
How much will local public media in your state lose under President Trump's funding repeal bill? • Alabama – $5,408,997 • Alaska – $12,023,34 • Arizona – $7,424,661 • Arkansas – $3,187,528 • California – $57,105,735 • Colorado – $7,655,017 • Connecticut – $3,017,018 • Delaware – $133,048
Because of the Big Beautiful Bill, some patients can’t use their Medicare plans to receive birth control, annual checkups, or cancer screenings at Planned Parenthood locations and many other nonprofits providing primary care.
President Trump and Senate Republicans are attempting to revoke funding from over 1,500 local media stations, hurting public broadcasting in every state. It would be a betrayal to every community. America relies on local media.
Map of the U.S. with dots marked for stations that will be impacted by funding cuts. Text on the graphic reads: 1500+ public broadcasting stations at risk.
A 20-year-old American was just beaten to death by a mob of Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank. President Trump revoked President Biden's sanctions against violent settlers on his first day in office. Congress should pass my bill to codify the Biden sanctions into law.
We just got new numbers on inflation: The price of food is up. The price of household supplies is up. The price of appliances is up. The price of clothing is up. The price of toys is up. Working families can't afford President Trump's policies.
Under Secretary Noem’s watch, FEMA instituted a new policy that requires her signature on any new expenses more than $100,000. That includes search and rescue teams. She confirmed it would take “a minimum of five days” for review. In a disaster, you don’t have five days.
Secretary Noem has suggested she and President Trump want to eliminate FEMA altogether rather than reform it. We can’t have a leader in charge of FEMA that is committed to its destruction.
In her short tenure, Secretary Noem has overstepped, under-performed, and endangered the lives of countless Americans. Today, I’m calling on her to resign or be fired.
President Trump has made it clear from the moment he took office that he would attempt to use the power of the presidency to go after his political opponents. His obvious lies are a disturbing attack on our democracy. I stand with Senator Schiff.
Since I led his first impeachment, Trump has repeatedly called for me to be arrested for treason.  So in a way, I guess this is a bit of a letdown. And this baseless attempt at political retribution won’t stop me from holding him accountable. Not by a long shot.
There’re many ways that public broadcasting improves our society. Taking funding away from public media will have serious safety consequences and hurt our communities.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
788 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-12-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-46)
2025-12-09End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-12-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-12-08End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-44)
2025-12-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (57-32)
2025-12-04S. Res. 520 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Rejected (43-37, 3/5 majority required)
2025-12-04H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (49-45)
2025-12-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (63-34)
2025-12-03S.J. Res. 91 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (49-47)
2025-12-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (57-41)
2025-12-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-40)
2025-12-02Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (60-39)
2025-12-02End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-36)
2025-12-02Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-12-01End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-41)
2025-11-20H.J. Res. 130 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-43)
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 76 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (46-51)
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-11-19Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (66-32)
2025-11-18End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (65-32)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (60-40)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-40, 3/5 majority required)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (60-40)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-40, 3/5 majority required)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Kill the motionNOYESMotion to Table Agreed to (76-24)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Failed (47-53)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Failed (47-53)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (60-40)
2025-11-09H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (60-40, 3/5 majority required)
2025-11-07S. 3012 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-43, 3/5 majority required)
2025-11-06S.J. Res. 90 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 90YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (49-51)
2025-11-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (57-43)
2025-11-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-11-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-11-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-11-04H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-44, 3/5 majority required)
2025-11-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-10-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-10-30S.J. Res. 88 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (51-47)
2025-10-30S.J. Res. 80 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (52-45)
2025-10-29S.J. Res. 77 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (50-46)
2025-10-29S.J. Res. 69 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (25-72)
2025-10-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-10-29S.J. Res. 80 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-10-28S.J. Res. 81 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (52-48)
2025-10-28End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-10-28Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-47)
2025-10-28End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-10-28H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (58-40)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 4 / 16Next →