PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Mark R. Warner headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Virginia
Born
December 15, 1954
Age 71
Phone
(202) 224-2023
Office
703 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Virginia

Mark R. Warner

Mark Robert Warner is an American businessman and politician serving as the senior United States senator from Virginia, a seat he has held since 2009. A member of the Democratic Party, Warner served as the 69th governor of Virginia from 2002 to 2006. He is vice chair of the Senate Democratic Caucus and vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 789
Yes35%
No61%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align90%
Cross-party10%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @MarkWarnerFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Mark R. Warner headshot
Mark R. Warner
U.S. SenatorDemocratVirginia
SoupScore
Mark R.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 170 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialJun 6(source)
I am sending best wishes to all Virginians observing Eid al-Adha! I was grateful to be able to celebrate with members of our Sudanese American community in Alexandria tonight – and I’ll continue pressing for peace in the tragic conflict in Sudan as well.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialJun 6(source)
Thousands of staff members and low-income students are left in the lurch by this administration’s cruel cuts to Job Corps centers. This administration continues to give a middle finger to the most vulnerable Americans – but we will keep fighting back.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialJun 5(source)
The Republican tax bill will throw 16 MILLION off their health insurance and add $2.4 trillion to the deficit. Just how big is $2.4 trillion? If you were counting to it, it would take over 76,000 years (counting continuously, day and night, a number a second).
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialJun 4(source)
Democrats used reconciliation to pass the Inflation Reduction Act, which will lower the deficit by hundreds of billions. Republicans are using it to try and pass a bill that would add trillions to the debt in order to give a tax cut to billionaires.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialJun 4(source)
The Republican tax plan will explode our deficit. The Trump administration is lying when they talk about cutting waste, fraud, and abuse. They’re saddling our kids and grandkids with an accelerating debt spiral while throwing millions off their health insurance.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialJun 4(source)
The administration that promised truth and transparency… is going after news outlets it doesn’t like and pressuring officials to change or delay independent assessments that are politically hurtful.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialJun 3(source)
This Republican tax bill is literally life-or-death stuff. Kicking millions of Americans off their health care doesn’t just raise costs. It means people delay or deny essential care. It means Americans will die of preventable illnesses.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialJun 3(source)
My thoughts today are with the victims of the despicable antisemitic attack in Colorado, and their families. Acts of hate like this have no place in our society, and I stand unequivocally with the Jewish community in opposing antisemitism and bigotry in all its forms.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialJun 2(source)
Another day of rank incompetence from this administration. www.reuters.com/world/us/dhs...
DHS removes list of 'sanctuary' cities after sheriffs push back on non-compliant label
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security removed a list of "sanctuary" states, cities and counties from its website following sharp criticism from a sheriffs' association that said a list of "non-compliant" sheriffs could severely damage the relationship between the Trump administration and law enforcement.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialJun 2(source)
The Republican tax bill is just an enormous cut to the health care of millions to give a tax break to a handful of the wealthiest Americans. I’ll be fighting it with everything I have got.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialMay 29(source)
Too many families are getting squeezed by the spiraling costs of rents and mortgages. Good to convene leaders from across Williamsburg to talk about tackling one of the biggest crises America is facing: the severe shortage of affordable housing.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialMay 29(source)
The courts are saving the Trump administration from itself and saving American businesses and families from these cruel taxes. If we know anything about this admin, though, they’ll stop at nothing to inflict more cruelty and bad policy. I’ll keep fighting their chaos.
Financial Times
@financialtimes.com
Open post ↗
Breaking news: The decision will have far-reaching implications for Trump's trade policy because it appears to stop the US president from imposing tariffs using the justification he has claimed. https://on.ft.com/43h1nBm
← Newer postsPosts page 49Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
789 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-10-01—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-10-01—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-10-01H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (55-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-01S. 2882 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-30H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Bill Defeated (55-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-30S. 2882 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Bill Defeated (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-29S. 2806 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (37-61, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-29—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-09-29—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-09-19—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (47-43)
2025-09-19—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-45)
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Bill Defeated (44-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-19S. 2882 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Bill Defeated (47-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-18—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-09-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-09-17—Decision of the Chair PN12-19 and PN25-28 and PN12-45 and PN22-1 and PN22-2 and PN22-5 and PN22-27 and PN22-20 and PN22-21 and PN26-8 and PN26-34 and PN26-35 and PN55-41 and PN22-4 and PN22-8 and PN22-19 and PN26-1 and PN22-23 and PN25-40 and PN26-7 and PN26-19 and PN26-31 and PN60-3 and PN26-44 and PN25-2 and PN55-16 and PN60-9 and PN60-10 and PN129-8 and PN26-45 and PN141-37 and PN141-7 and PN141-28 and PN12-22 and PN25-21 and PN22-3 and PN26-22 and PN13-5 and PN22-24 and PN25-33 and PN141-18 and PN150-5 and PN345-16 and PN55-42 and PN54-6 and PN54-7 and PN55-45 and PN55-25YESYES✓Decision of Chair Not Sustained (47-52)
2025-09-17—Motion to Reconsider PN55-25 and PN55-45 and PN54-7 and PN54-6 and PN55-42 and PN345-16 and PN150-5 and PN141-18 and PN25-33 and PN22-24 and PN13-5 and PN26-22 and PN22-3 and PN25-21 and PN12-22 and PN141-28 and PN141-7 and PN141-37 and PN26-45 and PN129-8 and PN60-10 and PN60-9 and PN55-16 and PN25-2 and PN26-44 and PN60-3 and PN26-31 and PN26-19 and PN26-7 and PN25-40 and PN22-23 and PN26-1 and PN22-19 and PN22-8 and PN22-4 and PN55-41 and PN26-35 and PN26-34 and PN26-8 and PN22-21 and PN22-20 and PN22-27 and PN22-5 and PN22-2 and PN22-1 and PN12-45 and PN12-19 and PN25-28NONO✓Motion to Reconsider Agreed to (51-47)
2025-09-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-16S. Con. Res. 22 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (36-62)
2025-09-16S.J. Res. 60 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-51)
2025-09-15—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (48-47)
2025-09-15—End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2025-09-15S. Res. 377 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Resolution Agreed to (51-44)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)Decision of the Chair S.Res. 377YESYES✓Decision of Chair Not Sustained (45-53)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)Motion to Reconsider S.Res. 377NONO✓Motion to Reconsider Agreed to (52-45)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-10S. 2296 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (51-49)
2025-09-09S. Res. 377 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-09-09S. Res. 377 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (53-46)
2025-09-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-09-09—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-09-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (49-46)
2025-09-09—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-09-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-09-08—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-43)
2025-09-04S. 2296 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (83-13)
2025-09-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-09-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-09-02S. 2296 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-14, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (71-23)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeYES——Nomination Confirmed (72-22)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (59-35)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (52-42)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (78-17)
2025-08-02—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-19)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-08-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-44)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 16Next →