H. Con. Res. 11 (119th)Bill Overview

Providing for a joint session of Congress to receive a message from the President.

Concurrent ResolutionCongress|CongressCongressional operations and organization
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Feb 11, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution schedules a joint session of the House and Senate to receive a message from the President on March 4, 2025. It is a congressional internal procedure that sets the time and place for both chambers to assemble. It does not create law, does not require the President's signature, and only directs Congress to meet at the specified time.

Passage rules

This is a concurrent resolution agreed to by both the House and the Senate for internal congressional business; it is not presented to the President and does not become law.

This concurrent resolution schedules a joint session of the House and Senate to receive a message from the President.

It directs both Houses to assemble in the House chamber on Tuesday, March 4, 2025, at 9:00 p.m. for that purpose.

The text contains only the date, time, and place for the presidential communication.

Passage95/100

Very likely to be agreed by both chambers: procedural, noncontroversial, no fiscal or policy implications; concurrent resolution mechanism is standard.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, well-formed procedural/agenda-setting concurrent resolution that clearly and specifically schedules a joint session to receive a presidential message.

Contention15/100

Progressives emphasize accountability and policy platform potential

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitFacilitates delivery of a presidential message directly to both chambers and the public.
  • Potential benefitMaintains the constitutional and historical practice of joint congressional sessions.
  • Potential benefitCreates a single, unified public event for media coverage and national attention.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenProduces incremental security, facility, and operational costs for the Capitol complex.
  • Potential burdenMay disrupt legislative business and committee work scheduled that evening.
  • Potential burdenGives the President a high-visibility platform without creating new legal obligations.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize accountability and policy platform potential
Progressive95%

Viewed as a routine constitutional and democratic procedure to hear the President.

Likely seen as an opportunity for public accountability and to advance progressive priorities if the President addresses them.

Leans supportive
Centrist92%

Seen as a routine, logistical measure that enables a standard presidential address to Congress.

Supportive if conducted respectfully, with attention to bipartisan decorum and minimal disruption to legislative work.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Treats the resolution as a normal procedural step; support depends on whether the President is of opposing party and the expected content.

Concerned about use as a campaign platform or expanded federal spectacle.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood95/100

Very likely to be agreed by both chambers: procedural, noncontroversial, no fiscal or policy implications; concurrent resolution mechanism is standard.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Unanticipated scheduling conflicts in either chamber
  • Objection by a member delaying unanimous consent
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize accountability and policy platform potential

Very likely to be agreed by both chambers: procedural, noncontroversial, no fiscal or policy implications; concurrent resolution mechanism…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, well-formed procedural/agenda-setting concurrent resolution that clearly and specifically schedules a joint session to receive a presidential message.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis