H. Con. Res. 12 (119th)Bill Overview

Supporting the Local Radio Freedom Act.

Concurrent ResolutionScience, Technology, Communications|Science, Technology, Communications
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Feb 13, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This concurrent resolution expresses Congress’s opposition to imposing any new performance fee, tax, royalty, or other charge on local radio stations or businesses for over‑the‑air public performances of sound recordings. It asserts that local radio provides promotional value to the recording industry, public service programming, and that new fees would harm stations, small businesses, and consumers.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize artist compensation and fairness for musicians

Watch point

Symbolic, narrow, and administratively simple; such nonbinding resolutions typically clear the House if not widely controversial.

This concurrent resolution expresses Congress’s opposition to imposing any new performance fee, tax, royalty, or other charge on local radio stations or businesses for over‑the‑air public performances of sound recordings.

It asserts that local radio provides promotional value to the recording industry, public service programming, and that new fees would harm stations, small businesses, and consumers.

The resolution urges that Congress should not adopt such a performance fee for broadcasting sound recordings.

Passage0/100

As a concurrent resolution making a policy statement, it is nonbinding and cannot itself become law; passage probability differs from 'become law' likelihood.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention72/100

Progressives emphasize artist compensation and fairness for musicians

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governments · Small businessesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Local governmentsHelps preserve local radio station revenues by preventing new per‑play performance charges.
  • Local governmentsSupports continued free over‑the‑air local news, emergency alerts, and public service programming funded by ads.
  • Small businessesAvoids added compliance and licensing costs for small businesses that play broadcast music.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenReduces prospects for additional royalty revenue to recording artists and sound‑recording rightsholders.
  • Potential burdenPerpetuates differing compensation models between broadcasters and digital streaming services for performances.
  • Potential burdenLimits legislative flexibility to modernize public performance remuneration for sound recordings.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize artist compensation and fairness for musicians
Progressive40%

Generally supports protecting local news and community media but is concerned about fair compensation for music creators.

Likely to view the blanket prohibition skeptically because it could preclude policies that pay artists for use of their work.

Split reaction
Centrist55%

Balances support for local media and small businesses with concern for creator compensation and flexible policy making.

Views the resolution as symbolic but worries the absolute prohibition could limit negotiated, targeted solutions.

Split reaction
Conservative90%

Strongly favors the resolution as a safeguard against new fees, taxes, or regulatory burdens on local broadcasters and small businesses.

Views local radio as vital to community information and opposes adding costs that could harm operations.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

As a concurrent resolution making a policy statement, it is nonbinding and cannot itself become law; passage probability differs from 'become law' likelihood.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Senate willingness to consider and pass a concurrent resolution
  • Intensity of lobbying by recording artists and rights holders
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize artist compensation and fairness for musicians

As a concurrent resolution making a policy statement, it is nonbinding and cannot itself become law; passage probability differs from 'beco…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Supporting the Local Radio Freedom Act..

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis