H. Con. Res. 120 (110th)Bill Overview

Honor Congressional Award Program and Youth Volunteerism

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|Awards, medals, prizesCommemorations
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 19, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Healthy Families and Communities.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses the view of Congress that the Federal government and the people of the United States should honor the spirit of volunteerism and personal growth promoted by the Congressional Award Program. It recounts the program's history and praises its role in encouraging youth service, goal-setting, and leadership. The resolution does not create new laws, direct funding, or change policy; it is a formal statement of support and recognition. It simply encourages public honor and continued support for the program.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions are adopted by both the House and the Senate but are not sent to the President and do not have the force of law; they serve to express the collective view or agreement of Congress.

This concurrent resolution expresses the Sense of Congress that the federal government and the American people should honor the spirit of volunteerism and personal growth promoted by the Congressional Award Program.

It recounts the Program's 1979 origin, bipartisan support, inclusivity for ages 14–24, public-private backing, and its benefits to participating youth and institutions.

Passage5/100

Text is nonbinding concurrent resolution (not a statute); likely agreeable but does not become law when adopted.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward sense-of-Congress concurrent resolution that articulates support for and recognition of the Congressional Award Program. It provides historical context and justification without creating legal obligations or operational directives.

Contention10/100

Progressives worry about private profit and access inequities

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises national visibility of the Congressional Award Program, potentially boosting youth participation.
  • Local governmentsSignals federal endorsement of volunteerism, possibly encouraging more private-sector and local support.
  • Potential benefitAffirms youth development goals like leadership, teamwork, and problem-solving promoted by the program.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesProvides only symbolic recognition and does not authorize funding or create enforceable federal obligations.
  • Federal agenciesIs unlikely to produce measurable changes in jobs, taxes, regulatory burden, or federal-state authority.
  • Potential burdenMay draw criticism for endorsing the program without requiring program evaluation or accountability measures.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives worry about private profit and access inequities
Progressive85%

Likely supportive overall because the resolution promotes youth development, civic engagement, and inclusivity.

May note the resolution is symbolic and want stronger federal investment to expand access and equity in such programs.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Generally favorable: the resolution is nonbinding praise of volunteerism and youth development.

Appreciates bipartisan tone but may want measurable outcomes or modest federal support tied to accountability.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Likely supportive because it celebrates volunteerism, personal responsibility, and public-private partnerships.

May prefer the resolution remain symbolic and avoid new federal programs or mandates.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

Text is nonbinding concurrent resolution (not a statute); likely agreeable but does not become law when adopted.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether both chambers will schedule floor consideration
  • Sponsorship and active lobbying intensity not specified
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives worry about private profit and access inequities

Text is nonbinding concurrent resolution (not a statute); likely agreeable but does not become law when adopted.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward sense-of-Congress concurrent resolution that articulates support for and recognition of the Congressional Award Program. It provides historical c…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis