H. Con. Res. 120 (111th)Bill Overview

Support National Womens Health Week and Preventive Care

Concurrent ResolutionHealth|Commemorative events and holidaysHealth
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
May 6, 2009
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses Congresss support for National Womens Health Week and encourages preventive care, healthy habits, and awareness of health disparities among women. It recognizes federal programs and calls on the public and women in particular to use the week to learn about women’s health and receive preventive screenings. It does not create binding law or require action; it is a formal statement of Congresss views meant to raise awareness.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions are adopted by both the House and Senate but are not sent to the President and do not have the force of law. They are nonbinding expressions of the collective view of Congress.

This concurrent resolution recognizes and supports National Women’s Health Week (May 10–16, 2009).

It encourages women to pursue preventive care, highlights disparities in women’s health, and affirms the role of federal, state, and private programs and women’s health offices in research and education.

The resolution is symbolic and contains no funding or regulatory mandates.

Passage5/100

Content would be easy to adopt, but as a concurrent resolution it is non‑binding and does not create law; adoption is likely but it won’t become statutory law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose, recognizes relevant federal offices, and issues nonbinding calls to action for National Women's Health Week while omitting implementation, fiscal, or accountability mechanisms that are not typically required for this type of instrument.

Contention12/100

Liberals seek funded, concrete measures beyond symbolic recognition

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesCities

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness about preventive care and women-specific health risks, potentially increasing screening uptake.
  • Federal agenciesEncourages early detection, which can reduce long-term treatment costs for Federal programs like Medicare and Medicaid.
  • Potential benefitHighlights disparities among racial, ethnic, and disabled women, prompting targeted outreach by public and private prog…
Likely burdened
  • CitiesProvides no new funding, making it largely symbolic with limited capacity to change healthcare access.
  • Potential burdenCould increase out-of-pocket costs for uninsured or underinsured women seeking recommended screenings.
  • Potential burdenPlaces responsibility on individuals without addressing systemic barriers like provider shortages and insurance gaps.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals seek funded, concrete measures beyond symbolic recognition
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive because the resolution promotes preventive care, highlights disparities, and affirms women’s health offices.

However, this persona will note the measure is symbolic and calls for stronger, funded policy action to address inequities.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Generally favorable as a bipartisan, low-risk expression encouraging prevention and public health.

Views it as useful for awareness but notes it lacks specifics, funding, or enforcement and therefore has limited policy bite.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Likely supportive because it is nonbinding, promotes personal prevention, and supports private and state roles.

Some concern may arise about any implied endorsement of expanded federal programs or future spending.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

Content would be easy to adopt, but as a concurrent resolution it is non‑binding and does not create law; adoption is likely but it won’t become statutory law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Concurrent resolution status means it won’t create binding law
  • No cost estimate or implementation guidance included
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals seek funded, concrete measures beyond symbolic recognition

Content would be easy to adopt, but as a concurrent resolution it is non‑binding and does not create law; adoption is likely but it won’t b…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose, recognizes relevant federal offices, and issues nonbinding calls to action for National…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis