Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
This resolution expresses Congress support for observing May 2007 as Mental Health Month, highlights facts about mental illness, and encourages awareness, reduced stigma, and attention to treatment and funding. It praises national and community efforts, urges use of Mental Health Month to promote services, and calls for adequate funding of the President's Commission recommendations. It does not create new law or require government spending; it simply records Congress views and recommendations.
Concurrent resolutions must be adopted by both the House and the Senate but are not sent to the President and do not have the force of law. This is a formal, nonbinding statement of Congress views and intentions.
This concurrent resolution designates May 2007 as Mental Health Month, highlights the prevalence and costs of mental illness, and urges action to reduce stigma and improve access to care.
It endorses parity between mental and physical health, applauds community awareness efforts, supports funding of the President’s Commission on Mental Health findings, and encourages organizations to promote services and awareness, with specific references to veterans, disaster survivors, and recent tragedies.
As a nonbinding, consensus-oriented concurrent resolution, it has a high chance of adoption by both chambers; it does not create enforceable law.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed symbolic/concurrent resolution: it provides a clear and detailed statement of the problem and uses appropriate declaratory language to support Mental Health Month and urge awareness and funding. It does not create legal obligations or operational mechanisms, nor does it provide implementation, fiscal, or accountability detail, which is consistent with the nonbinding, commemorative character of the instrument.
Liberals emphasize funding, parity enforcement, and expanded services.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize funding, parity enforcement, and expanded services.
Likely strongly supportive: views the resolution as a needed public-health and social-justice statement.
Sees official recognition as helpful to reduce stigma and press for parity and funding for services, especially for veterans, youth, and disaster survivors.
Generally supportive but careful: welcomes awareness and focus on treatment gaps while seeking clear cost, implementation, and federal-versus-state responsibilities.
Views the resolution as a useful prompt but wants follow-up specificity on funding and measurable outcomes.
Cautiously positive about awareness goals but wary of implied federal spending and mandates.
Supports veteran care and stigma reduction, but skeptical of broad parity commitments without cost controls and state flexibility.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
As a nonbinding, consensus-oriented concurrent resolution, it has a high chance of adoption by both chambers; it does not create enforceable law.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize funding, parity enforcement, and expanded services.
As a nonbinding, consensus-oriented concurrent resolution, it has a high chance of adoption by both chambers; it does not create enforceabl…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed symbolic/concurrent resolution: it provides a clear and detailed statement of the problem and uses appropriate declaratory language to support M…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.