H. Con. Res. 142 (111th)Bill Overview

Support National Men's Health Week

Concurrent ResolutionHealth|Commemorative events and holidaysHealth
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jun 3, 2009
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses Congress's support for National Men's Health Week and encourages awareness of men's preventive health. It asks the President to issue a proclamation calling on people and organizations to observe the week with appropriate activities. The resolution is a statement of Congress's position and does not create new law or provide funding.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions are adopted by both the House and Senate but are not presented to the President and do not have the force of law; they state Congress's view or make a request. This resolution asks the President for a proclamation but does not require action or change legal rights.

This concurrent resolution supports National Men’s Health Week (June 15–21, 2009), highlights disparities in men’s morbidity and mortality, and encourages increased awareness, preventive screenings, and healthy behaviors.

It requests the President issue a proclamation calling on Americans and interested groups to observe the week with appropriate activities.

The resolution is symbolic; it contains no authorization of spending or new regulatory requirements.

Passage0/100

Concurrent resolution is nonbinding and cannot become law; adoption by both chambers possible but not legislative enactment.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a conventional commemorative concurrent resolution: it articulates rationale for the observance, states support, and requests a Presidential proclamation without creating legal obligations or appropriations.

Contention15/100

Liberty vs systemic change: liberals want access measures; conservatives prefer symbolic action

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises national awareness of men’s health issues and encourages preventive behaviors and screenings.
  • Potential benefitMay increase demand for screening services, potentially enabling earlier detection of cancer and heart disease.
  • Local governmentsEncourages states, local governments, and community groups to organize outreach and health promotion events.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenAs a symbolic resolution, it may produce limited measurable improvements in population health.
  • Potential burdenIncreased screening could raise short‑term healthcare utilization and associated costs for insurers and providers.
  • Potential burdenMay encourage use of contested screenings, such as PSA testing, without clarifying clinical guidance.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberty vs systemic change: liberals want access measures; conservatives prefer symbolic action
Progressive80%

Likely to welcome attention to male health disparities and the call for preventive care, especially noting racial gaps.

Will note the resolution is symbolic and critique the absence of measures expanding access to care or addressing social determinants.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Viewed as a straightforward, low-cost public health statement that promotes prevention and bipartisan cooperation.

Will emphasize evidence-based messaging and caution about unintended consequences of screening recommendations.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Likely to support the resolution's encouragement of personal responsibility, family health, and state-level proclamations.

Will prefer the measure remain symbolic without creating federal programs or mandates.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

Concurrent resolution is nonbinding and cannot become law; adoption by both chambers possible but not legislative enactment.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether Senate committee will prioritize a noncontroversial resolution
  • Possible objections to specific medical screening language
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberty vs systemic change: liberals want access measures; conservatives prefer symbolic action

Concurrent resolution is nonbinding and cannot become law; adoption by both chambers possible but not legislative enactment.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a conventional commemorative concurrent resolution: it articulates rationale for the observance, states support, and requests a Presidential proclamation…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis