H. Con. Res. 152 (111th)Bill Overview

Commend Bureau of Labor Statistics 125th Anniversary

Concurrent ResolutionLabor and Employment|Commemorative events and holidaysCongressional tributes
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Jun 12, 2009
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution formally commends the Bureau of Labor Statistics on its 125th anniversary and highlights the agency's work producing economic data and maintaining a public website. It is a statement of recognition and praise from Congress, not a new law or legal requirement. The resolution records Congress's appreciation but does not change agency duties or create binding obligations. It simply publicly acknowledges the agency's service and contributions.

Issuing agency

Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions are adopted by both the House and Senate but are not presented to the President and do not have the force of law; this is a nonbinding expression of Congress's views.

This concurrent resolution commends the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on its 125th anniversary.

It summarizes BLS’s history, core functions (unemployment, CPI, productivity, wages), online presence, and reputation for professional competence.

The resolution is ceremonial and expresses congressional appreciation but does not change law or funding.

Passage85/100

Very high chance of congressional adoption as a concurrent resolution; note concurrent resolutions do not become statutory law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative concurrent resolution: its purpose is clearly stated, the single symbolic action is explicitly provided, and the level of procedural and substantive detail is proportionate to a non-binding commendation.

Contention10/100

Liberal emphasizes funding and disaggregated inequality data

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
WorkersLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitFormally recognizes BLS contributions, potentially boosting staff morale and institutional pride.
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness of key BLS products like CPI and unemployment statistics.
  • WorkersAffirms the importance of reliable labor statistics for policymaking, budgets, and private contracts.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenThe resolution is purely symbolic and creates no binding legal or budgetary changes.
  • Potential burdenIt does not provide new funding or resources to address BLS workloads or modernization needs.
  • Potential burdenFails to address substantive methodological criticisms or requested reforms of specific BLS measures.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes funding and disaggregated inequality data
Progressive95%

Likely welcomes formal recognition of BLS as essential to evidence-based policy and social programs.

Views the resolution as a positive symbolic gesture but would prefer parallel commitments to expanded data on inequality and sustained funding.

Sees BLS statistics as crucial for protecting low-income people and adjusting benefits.

Leans supportive
Centrist95%

Sees the resolution as a routine, noncontroversial acknowledgment of a useful federal agency.

Values BLS’s nonpartisan data and its contribution to policymaking and markets.

Prefers maintaining independence, technical quality, and transparency while avoiding politicization.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Generally supportive of recognizing a longstanding statistical agency that serves markets and policy.

Views the resolution as harmless but may question ceremonial congressional actions.

Some conservatives may worry about federal bureaucracy size and urge cost-efficiency and methodological rigor.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood85/100

Very high chance of congressional adoption as a concurrent resolution; note concurrent resolutions do not become statutory law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether committee will schedule the measure for consideration
  • Any objection delaying unanimous‑consent floor action
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes funding and disaggregated inequality data

Very high chance of congressional adoption as a concurrent resolution; note concurrent resolutions do not become statutory law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative concurrent resolution: its purpose is clearly stated, the single symbolic action is explicitly provided, and the level of procedur…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis