H. Con. Res. 172 (110th)Bill Overview

Honoring Nine Charleston Firefighters Killed June 18, 2007

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|CommemorationsCongressional tributes
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Jun 21, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S13493)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution honors the nine Charleston firefighters who died on June 18, 2007, and recognizes their devoted public service. As a concurrent resolution, it records Congress's official expression of sympathy and respect but does not change federal law or create any legal rights. It is a symbolic, nonbinding statement adopted by both the House and the Senate and is not sent to the President.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions must be approved by both the House and the Senate but are not presented to the President and do not carry the force of law. They are commonly used to express Congress's collective sentiments or handle internal congressional matters.

This concurrent resolution honors the nine City of Charleston firefighters who died on June 18, 2007.

It names the individuals, recognizes their combined service, and records Congress's gratitude for their sacrifice.

The measure is ceremonial and was received in the Senate after passing the House.

Passage0/100

As a concurrent resolution it is ceremonial and does not become law; adoption by both chambers is plausible but not 'law'.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative concurrent resolution that clearly states its purpose and identifies the individuals honored; its limited drafting and absence of fiscal or implementation provisions are appropriate to its symbolic function.

Contention5/100

Liberal wants follow-up funding or survivor support tied to the resolution

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · CommunitiesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesProvides formal federal recognition of the firefighters' sacrifice and public service.
  • CommunitiesOffers official condolences and visibility for the victims' families and the Charleston community.
  • Potential benefitReinforces morale and esteem for firefighters and other first responders nationwide.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenConfers no legal, financial, or benefits entitlement to victims' families; entirely symbolic.
  • Potential burdenRepresents use of congressional time for a ceremonial action instead of substantive policymaking.
  • Potential burdenMay create perceptions of unequal recognition if similar tragedies receive different attention.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal wants follow-up funding or survivor support tied to the resolution
Progressive95%

Strongly supportive of honoring first responders and recognizing their sacrifice.

May also see this as an opportunity to call for better fire-safety funding and survivor support.

Views the resolution as an important moral gesture.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Supportive of a noncontroversial, ceremonial resolution honoring deceased firefighters.

Appreciates bipartisan, unifying tone while preferring practical follow-up measures for families and safety improvements.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Supportive of honoring fallen firefighters and valuing public service.

Views the resolution as appropriate ceremony but prefers no expansion of federal obligations or costly new programs tied to it.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

As a concurrent resolution it is ceremonial and does not become law; adoption by both chambers is plausible but not 'law'.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Senate scheduling and floor time availability
  • Potential procedural objections in the Senate
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal wants follow-up funding or survivor support tied to the resolution

As a concurrent resolution it is ceremonial and does not become law; adoption by both chambers is plausible but not 'law'.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative concurrent resolution that clearly states its purpose and identifies the individuals honored; its limited drafting and absence of f…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis