H. Con. Res. 182 (110th)Bill Overview

Support National Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Awareness Week

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|CommemorationsCongressional tributes
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jul 12, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution recognizes the need for more research into the causes, treatments, and a cure for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and expresses support for a National Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Awareness Week. It praises advocates and organizations that educate and support patients and welcomes a proclamation designating such a week. As a concurrent resolution, it states Congresss collective view and encourages awareness and research but does not create binding law or require government action.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions are agreed to by both the House and the Senate but are not sent to the President and do not have the force of law. This measure therefore expresses Congresss position and support but does not impose legal requirements.

This concurrent resolution recognizes idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) as a serious, often fatal lung disease, supports research into causes and cures, and endorses creating and observing a National Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Awareness Week.

It does not appropriate funds or create new regulatory authorities; it expresses congressional support and congratulates advocates.

Passage0/100

Concurrent resolutions are nonbinding and do not become law; adoption is likely but 'become law' is inapplicable.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-formed symbolic/conmemorative concurrent resolution: it clearly states the problem and appropriately uses declaratory language to recognize and support an awareness week, while not creating binding obligations or fiscal commitments.

Contention12/100

Left emphasizes need for funded research and equity in diagnosis

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness and may increase early detection and diagnosis.
  • Potential benefitSignals congressional support could encourage nonprofits to expand education and patient support services.
  • Local governmentsMay motivate state and local governments to proclaim awareness week and host related events.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenNon-binding resolution creates no new funding, regulatory authority, or entitlement programs.
  • Federal agenciesMay raise patient and public expectations without commensurate federal research appropriations.
  • Potential burdenOpportunity cost: legislative time allocated to symbolic measures instead of binding policy changes.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes need for funded research and equity in diagnosis
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive as a compassionate, public‑health–oriented measure that acknowledges a neglected disease and backs research and awareness efforts.

May view it as a useful symbolic step but want concrete funding and equity-focused research commitments.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally supportive because the resolution is noncontroversial, bipartisan, and focused on health awareness.

Views it as appropriate but limited in impact without subsequent funding or measurable objectives.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Likely supportive because the resolution is symbolic, non‑regulatory, and focuses on disease awareness and research encouragement.

May caution against implying future federal spending or expanded federal programs.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

Concurrent resolutions are nonbinding and do not become law; adoption is likely but 'become law' is inapplicable.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Possible procedural objections or holds by individual members
  • Whether the Senate will schedule consideration promptly
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes need for funded research and equity in diagnosis

Concurrent resolutions are nonbinding and do not become law; adoption is likely but 'become law' is inapplicable.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-formed symbolic/conmemorative concurrent resolution: it clearly states the problem and appropriately uses declaratory language to recognize and support an a…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis