H. Con. Res. 195 (110th)Bill Overview

Establish National Dysphagia Awareness Month

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|CommemorationsDigestive diseases
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Jul 27, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses the sense of Congress that a National Dysphagia Awareness Month should be established. It does not create a law, a federal holiday, or provide funding; it is a formal statement of opinion and intent. As a concurrent resolution, it was adopted by both the House and Senate but is not sent to the President and does not have legal force. The stated purpose is to raise public awareness about dysphagia and encourage early detection and treatment.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions are adopted by both chambers and are not presented to the President; they do not have the force of law and are nonbinding.

This concurrent resolution expresses the sense of Congress that a National Dysphagia Awareness Month should be established.

It summarizes prevalence, mortality, and cost estimates related to dysphagia and states that observing June 2008 would raise public awareness.

The resolution is nonbinding and does not authorize funding or federal programs.

Passage5/100

Very unlikely to 'become law' because it is a nonbinding concurrent resolution; high chance of adoption but not enactment as statutory law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a conventional commemorative concurrent resolution that succinctly states facts about dysphagia and expresses Congress's view that a National Dysphagia Awareness Month should be established. It provides strong problem definition but little operational detail, which is typical for this type of instrument.

Contention5/100

Liberty_left wants this as step toward funding and services

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness, potentially increasing early recognition and referrals for dysphagia screening and treatment.
  • Potential benefitCould decrease complications like aspiration pneumonia through earlier intervention, possibly lowering some hospital re…
  • Potential benefitMay encourage professional training and clinical guideline adoption for high-risk populations such as stroke survivors.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesNon-binding symbolic resolution with no new federal funding or regulatory mandates.
  • Potential burdenBecause no appropriation is authorized, practical awareness activities depend on existing budgets and private groups.
  • Potential burdenIncreased detection could raise short-term health-care costs by identifying more patients needing services.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberty_left wants this as step toward funding and services
Progressive95%

Likely views the resolution positively as a low-cost public-health awareness measure that highlights an underserved medical need.

Sees potential to spur better screening, support for older adults, and attention to health equity.

May want follow-up action such as research funding and expanded services.

Leans supportive
Centrist95%

Likely supportive given the resolution is nonbinding and focuses on public health awareness.

Views it as a modest, bipartisan step to inform clinicians and families.

Wants clarity that no new spending is mandated and prefers measured next steps based on evidence.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Likely largely supportive because the resolution is symbolic and nonbinding.

May appreciate attention to seniors and reducing medical complications.

Some conservatives could question using Congressional time for awareness months, preferring state or private initiatives.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

Very unlikely to 'become law' because it is a nonbinding concurrent resolution; high chance of adoption but not enactment as statutory law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the Senate will prioritize considering the concurrent resolution
  • Timing relative to legislative calendar and unanimous consent availability
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberty_left wants this as step toward funding and services

Very unlikely to 'become law' because it is a nonbinding concurrent resolution; high chance of adoption but not enactment as statutory law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a conventional commemorative concurrent resolution that succinctly states facts about dysphagia and expresses Congress's view that a National Dysphagia Awareness M…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis