Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
This resolution expresses the sense of Congress that the Government of Iraq should hold a referendum asking Iraqis whether U.S. forces should withdraw or remain until order is restored. It is a non-binding statement that does not create law or force the Iraqi government to act. The resolution ties the requested referendum timing to the submission of a second report to Congress about Iraq's progress on benchmarks under existing U.S. law.
As a concurrent resolution, it would need approval by both the House and the Senate to be adopted but would not be sent to the President and does not have the force of law.
This concurrent resolution expresses the sense of Congress that the Government of Iraq should schedule a referendum asking Iraqis whether U.S. Armed Forces should withdraw or remain until order is restored.
It calls for that referendum to be scheduled as soon as practicable after Congress receives the second report required by section 1314(b)(2) of Public Law 110–28 (benchmarks on Iraqi performance).
The measure is a non‑binding statement of congressional opinion and was referred to the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
Non-binding, low fiscal impact makes passage possible, but high political sensitivity and limited compromise features reduce chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-anchored expression of congressional sentiment. It clearly states the desired outcome and ties timing to an existing statutory report, but it intentionally lacks operational, fiscal, and accountability mechanisms appropriate to a nonbinding resolution.
Left emphasizes Iraqi self‑determination and ending occupation
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left emphasizes Iraqi self‑determination and ending occupation
Likely broadly supportive because it emphasizes Iraqi self‑determination and an exit pathway for U.S. forces.
Supporters would still want safeguards to ensure a free, fair, secure referendum and protection for displaced voters.
They may press for international monitoring and a clear timeline tied to human rights and civilian safety.
Cautiously receptive: sees value in democratic legitimacy but worries about feasibility and unintended consequences.
Views the resolution as largely symbolic; would push for clear criteria, contingency planning, and alignment with benchmarks and security assessments before any major policy change.
Likely skeptical or opposed because it asks a foreign government to hold a referendum that could push for premature U.S. withdrawal.
Concerns focus on national security, troop safety, and preserving U.S. flexibility rather than deferring to a potentially unstable plebiscite.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Non-binding, low fiscal impact makes passage possible, but high political sensitivity and limited compromise features reduce chances.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left emphasizes Iraqi self‑determination and ending occupation
Non-binding, low fiscal impact makes passage possible, but high political sensitivity and limited compromise features reduce chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, well-anchored expression of congressional sentiment. It clearly states the desired outcome and ties timing to an existing statutory report, but…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.