H. Con. Res. 205 (110th)Bill Overview

Support National Women's Friendship Day

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|CommemorationsSpecial days
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Sep 6, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses Congress's support for National Women's Friendship Day and encourages communities to recognize and celebrate it. It simply states the shared views of the Houses of Congress about the day and promotes awareness and community activities. It does not create a new law, program, or legal requirement.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions must be approved by both the House and the Senate but are not presented to the President and do not have the force of law. They are a formal way for both chambers to express a joint position or sentiment.

This concurrent resolution expresses Congressional support for the goals and ideals of National Women’s Friendship Day, notes research on social ties and women’s health, recognizes Kappa Delta Sorority’s role, and encourages communities to observe the day (third Sunday in September).

It is a non-binding, symbolic statement without authorization of funding or new programs.

Passage90/100

Highly likely to be adopted by both chambers given its narrow, symbolic nature; note concurrent resolutions are nonbinding and do not become statutory law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, provides supporting findings, and contains concise operative clauses expressing support and encouraging recognition of National Women's Friendship Day.

Contention25/100

Libs emphasize public-health and community benefits; conservatives emphasize federal overreach.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Communities · Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • CommunitiesRaises awareness of women's social support benefits, potentially increasing community engagement and mutual aid.
  • Local governmentsEncourages grassroots activities that could increase volunteerism and charitable drives benefiting local communities.
  • Potential benefitFrames friendship as a public-health asset, supporting awareness of stress reduction and mental health benefits.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesSymbolic resolution occupies congressional time without creating binding policy or allocating federal resources.
  • Potential burdenReferences a named private sorority, which critics may view as perceived favoritism toward that organization.
  • Potential burdenProvides no legislative remedies for structural issues affecting women, such as pay equity or healthcare access.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Libs emphasize public-health and community benefits; conservatives emphasize federal overreach.
Progressive90%

Likely strongly supportive: applauds public recognition of women’s social ties and associated health and community benefits.

Views symbolic federal attention as a useful way to highlight women’s networks and encourage community action.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable but pragmatic: sees this as a low-cost, noncontroversial resolution that can promote community well-being.

Prefers that symbolism be paired with measurable, targeted support if policy action follows.

Leans supportive
Conservative55%

Cautiously supportive in principle of voluntary community ties, but skeptical of congressional involvement in symbolic observances.

Prefers private organizations and states lead such recognitions rather than federal bodies.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood90/100

Highly likely to be adopted by both chambers given its narrow, symbolic nature; note concurrent resolutions are nonbinding and do not become statutory law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the Senate will prioritize a nonbinding resolution for floor time
  • Possible minor objections to organizational mentions or wording
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Libs emphasize public-health and community benefits; conservatives emphasize federal overreach.

Highly likely to be adopted by both chambers given its narrow, symbolic nature; note concurrent resolutions are nonbinding and do not becom…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, provides supporting findings, and contains concise operative clauses expressing support…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis