H. Con. Res. 212 (110th)Bill Overview

Honor Romare Bearden as a Preeminent 20th Century Artist

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|ArtistsArts, Culture, Religion
Cosponsors
Support
Unknown
Introduced
Sep 17, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses the sense of Congress that Romare Howard Bearden should be recognized as a preeminent 20th century artist. It is a formal, ceremonial statement that honors his life and work but does not create legal rights or change government policy. Because it is a concurrent resolution, it would be adopted by both the House and the Senate but is not sent to the President and does not have the force of law. Its effect is symbolic and commemorative only.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions must be approved by both the House and the Senate but are not presented to the President and do not create binding law. This is a nonbinding, honorary statement of Congress's view.

This concurrent resolution expresses the sense of Congress that artist Romare Bearden should be recognized as a preeminent 20th century artist for his depiction of the complexity and richness of African American life.

The text reviews Bearden’s biography, career milestones, honors, and contributions to African American art, and urges that he be honored for his cultural legacy.

The resolution is nonbinding and purely honorary.

Passage2/100

As a concurrent resolution it is honorary and non-binding and does not become law; adoption as a resolution is likely, statutory enactment is not applicable.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative concurrent resolution: it clearly articulates the purpose to honor Romare Bearden and provides supporting biographical material, while containing no operative mechanics, fiscal authorizations, or statutory changes.

Contention10/100

Progressives emphasize representational and restorative value

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedStates · Federal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness of Bearden's work and legacy through formal congressional recognition.
  • Potential benefitEncourages museums and educators to include Bearden's art in exhibits and curricula.
  • Potential benefitHighlights African American cultural contributions and supports broader diversity in the arts.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCreates no binding legal obligations, funding, or regulatory change.
  • StatesUses congressional time for a symbolic statement rather than legislative or oversight priorities.
  • Federal agenciesInvites debate about whether federal bodies should endorse particular cultural figures or judgments.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize representational and restorative value
Progressive95%

Likely views the resolution positively as overdue recognition of a major Black artist whose work documents African American life.

May see it as an important symbolic step toward broader cultural inclusion and public acknowledgment of historically underrecognized artists.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Generally supportive because the resolution is honorary, low-cost, and bipartisan in spirit.

Would appreciate recognition of cultural figures but would note limited practical impact and potential tradeoffs in congressional time.

Leans supportive
Conservative75%

Likely tolerant or mildly supportive of an honorary resolution for an acclaimed artist, while emphasizing limited federal role and caution about congressional time spent on symbolic matters.

Support depends on the absence of new spending or mandates.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood2/100

As a concurrent resolution it is honorary and non-binding and does not become law; adoption as a resolution is likely, statutory enactment is not applicable.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House schedules floor consideration
  • Whether the Senate will take up the concurrent resolution
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize representational and restorative value

As a concurrent resolution it is honorary and non-binding and does not become law; adoption as a resolution is likely, statutory enactment…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative concurrent resolution: it clearly articulates the purpose to honor Romare Bearden and provides supporting biographical material, wh…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis